The Facts of R.A.V. v. St. Paul:
Teenagers constructed a crude cross in the backyard of a black family and burned it. The petitioner was charged with violating a St. Paul ordinance which states that anyone using objects such as (but not limited to) a burning cross or Nazi swastika which one "has reasonable grounds to know arouses anger, alarm or resentment in others on the basis of race, color, creed, religion or gender" is guilty of disorderly conduct.

CompuLEGAL is currently analyzing this case.  For now, you may view the visual of this case.  If you would like CompuLEGAL to guide you through and analysis, please return to the CompuLEGAL Database.


If you are using CompuLEGAL to analyze R.A.V. v. St.Paul, you may also want to view a visual of the case.  Once you understand the conflict, proceed to the Analysis Page.

If you are only looking for case law, proceed to the Precedents Page.