Individual
Rights vs. National Security
Kelly Hajdasz
John F. Kennedy
Middle School
Utica City School
District
Introduction:
In times of national crises, emotions run
high. One of the most prevalent emotions
is fear. Fear for our families. Fear for our safety. Fear of the unknown. We look to the government to respond
quickly and to keep us safe. The
government, in an attempt to respond quickly, has many times created laws or
policies that have infringed upon or straight out violated individual rights of
Americans. Within time, the inevitable
debate arises: Which is more important – individual rights or national
security?
Task:
You are a U.S. senator and have found yourself
in the position of casting a tiebreaking vote.
The bill before the Senate would increase the security of the U.S. but
critics argue that it infringes on individual rights. Before you cast your vote, you must decide if
the government has the right to limit individual rights in order to keep our
nation safe.
·
Explain 3 examples in history when
the government restricted the rights of people in response to a national
crisis.
·
In each of these examples, explain
how the government kept the U.S. safe AND how the government violated
individual rights.
·
In your opinion, is the government
justified in limiting the rights of individuals to keep the U.S. safe? Support your position with at least 3
reasons.
BONUS: In one
of the above examples, create a policy in response to the national crisis that
does not infringe on individual rights.
Process/Resources:
Each student will complete the four steps
of the AHPPA to gather information to write their position paper. Please use the attached worksheets (see below). The handouts must be filled in before the
position paper can be written. The
position paper will require the use of all four steps.
Step 1 – Identify
the Problem – What is the importance of national security? What is the importance of individual rights? Worksheet 1,
Step 2 – Gather
the Evidence - Explain how in each policy the government’s actions kept
the U.S safe. Explain how in each policy
the government’s actions violated individual rights. Worksheet2
Step 3 – Causes
of the Problems – Explain each historical event associated with each
policy. Worksheet3
Step 4 – Evaluate
the Policy – Was the government justified in limiting the rights of
people at that time? State and support
your position. Worksheet4
IN FLANDERS FIELDS POEM
|
|
· WWI
|
|
· Japanese-American Internment
· WWII
· First they came for the Jews
Evaluation-
Your work will be assessed using the
following rubric:
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
Paper
Analysis |
Thoroughly
explains the history and resulting policy evenly and in depth |
Explains
the history and resulting policy but may do so unevenly |
Attempts
to explain the history and resulting policy |
States
the history and resulting policy with little or no explanation |
Attempts
to state the history and resulting policy; may be vague or unclear |
Fails
to state the history and resulting policy |
Graphic
organizer |
Contains
5 w’s and how that are accurate and detailed |
Contains
5 w’s and/or how that are accurate |
Contains
4 w’s and/or how that are accurate |
Contains
3 w’s and/or how that may contain inaccuracies |
Contains
2 or less w’s and/or how that may contain inaccuracies |
Fails
to list the w’s and how |
Position
Statement |
States
position with strong reasoning |
States
position that is backed with sound reasoning |
States
position with little reasoning |
States
position with no reasoning |
States
position with faulty reasoning |
Does
not state position |
Organization |
Logical
and clear plan of organization including transition sentences |
Clear
plan of organization |
Satisfactory
plan of organization |
General
plan of organization; may contain digressions |
Weakness
in organization; may lack focus |
unorganized |
Standards –
The
following state standards were considered and covered in the creation of this
web quest.
English
Language Arts
Standard
1: Language
for Information and Understanding
Students
will listen, speak, read, and write for information and understanding. As
listeners and readers, students will collect data, facts, and ideas; discover
relationships, concepts, and generalizations; and use knowledge generated from
oral, written, and electronically produced texts. As speakers and writers, they
will use oral and written language that follows the accepted conventions of the
English language to acquire, interpret, apply, and transmit information.
Standard 3: Language for Critical Analysis and
Evaluation
Students will listen, speak, read, and write for critical analysis and
evaluation. As listeners and readers, students will analyze experiences, ideas,
information, and issues presented by others using a variety of established
criteria. As speakers and writers, they will use oral and written language that
follows the accepted conventions of the English language to present, from a
variety of perspectives, their opinions and judgments on experiences, ideas,
information and issues.
Social
Studies
Standard 1: History of the United States and New
York
Students will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their
understanding of major ideas, eras, themes, developments, and turning points in
the history of the United States and New York.
Standard 2: World History
Students will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their
understanding of major ideas, eras, themes, developments, and turning points in
world history and examine the broad sweep of history from a variety of
perspectives.
Standard 5: Civics, Citizenship, and Government
Students will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of
the necessity for establishing governments; the governmental system of the U.S.
and other nations; the U.S. Constitution; the basic civic values of American
constitutional democracy; and the roles, rights, and responsibilities of
citizenship, including avenues of participation.
Computer Technology
Key idea: Computers, as tools for design,
modeling, information processing, communication, and system control, have
greatly increased human productivity and knowledge.
Core Curriculum
Learning Standards
Writing Standards for Literacy
in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 6–12
Write arguments focused on discipline-specific content.
a. Introduce claim(s) about a topic or issue, acknowledge and
distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and organize the
reasons
and
evidence logically.
b. Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant,
accurate data and evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or
text, using credible sources.
Conclusion:
Congratulations! Through careful consideration and thoughtful
deliberation, you can now make a more informed decision in the voting booth and
intellectually debate the issue of national security versus individual rights.