Your School--Your Planet 

 

 


**YOUR CHOICE?**

A WebQuest

USSC: Brown v. Board of Education

 

Mr. Mann                                        

Monroe Academy

for Business and Law 

--H6$--

 

?

?

?

?

?

I.  INTRODUCTION:

 

You are about to begin high school, but you and your family have a problem: you are “environmentally-conscious” and feel it is necessary for you to obey city, state and federal recycling laws.  However, the school to which you have been assigned (“school x”), either due to neglect or indifference, consistently violates these laws.  Though school x is close to your home (you can easily walk there), you know it is not nearly as good as “school y.”  School y has a policy of obeying the law and setting a good moral example to the students and the community, but your problem is that school y is many miles away from your home, you have not been assigned there, and you have many friends who will be attending school x.

What do you do?  Should you go to the inferior school that is near to you, or should you try to gain admission at the superior school, which is far away and where you will be a stranger.

Your future will in large part be decided by the decision you make.  You know y students whose skills and knowledge are far superior to the students who attend school x.  And you have even more evidence: y students who have graduated have had better and more opportunities, both in employment and in higher education, than their student x counterparts.

 

It’s your life, so only you can decide what to do next....Therefore, you object to school x’s failure to follow recycling laws as a violation of your rights under the 8th, 10th, and 14th Amendments.  Your Local Instructional Supervisor (LIS) tells you that you must attend the school to which you have been assigned (school x).  A friend tells you that a U.S. Supreme Court Case,

Brown v. Board of Education, deals with issues similar to those you are facing. 

What will you do next…?

 

                             

II. TASK:

 

Using Compulegal, you will research the case of Brown v. Board of Education.  You will write report (3-5 pages, typed, double-spaced) comparing the imaginary scenario above with the real situation of Brown v. Board of Education.  You will also make a short oral presentation (approximately 5 minutes) to the class, including a time for questions and answers.

The written portion of this assignment is due the day we come back from Spring Break.  The oral presentation part of this assignment will be scheduled randomly for the first week in May.

 

 

II. PROCESS:

 

1.                   In Compulegal, you will now research the case of Brown v. Board of Education.

a.      Review the facts of the case

b.     List them on a sheet of paper.

c.      Examine the visuals. 

d.      Summarize the main points.

e.      How did the U.S. Court of Appeals rule?  Why was the U.S

    Supreme Court brought into this case by Brown?

f.      Now go to the reasoning page.

g.      Follow the instructions on this page and submit them.

                                                              i.      Review the precedents and explain why each case cited is a precedent.

                                                           ii.      On a separate sheet of paper, answer the questions posed above each box on this page.

h.      Next, you will investigate the actual decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court. 

                                                              i.      What was the Court’s decision?

                                                           ii.      Do you agree or disagree with the Court’s decision?  Explain your answer.

                                                         iii.      Does the Court’s decision set a precedent that you can apply to the imaginary situation described in the Introduction?  If so, to what extent?  If not, why not?

 

2.                 Now you will write your paper (3-5 pages in length).  In your paper you will:

a.      Summarize the facts, arguments and decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education.

b.     Discuss the similarities of Brown v. Board of Education to your case

c.      Discuss the differences of Brown v. Board of Education to your case

d.      Discuss if you think the Superintendency is justified requiring you to go to school x.  Explain your answer.

 

3.                 In your oral presentation you will answer the question posed in 2.d.  You will have 5-minutes for your presentation, in addition to a 1-minute period of questioning from member of the class.

 

 

 

III. RESOURCES:

 

You will use resources within CompuLEGAL (as hyperlinked above) as the basis of your research.  You may, of course, also use a variety of other online resources, as discussed in class.

 

 

IV. EVALUATION:

 

Your teacher and a randomly-selected member of the class will now assign a grade to your report and assignment.  Your final Webquest grade will be the average of these two grades.  You will be graded according to the following:

 

Earned a Grade of  4

q              Shows thorough understanding of the topic

q              Addresses all aspects of the task

q              Shows ability to analyze, evaluate, compare and contrast issues

q              Richly supports topic with relevant facts, examples, and details

q              Shows ability to analyze, evaluate, compare and contrast issues

q              Richly supports topic with relevant facts, examples, and details

q              Presents a strong and well organized “ case”

 

Earned a Grade of 3

q              Shows a good understanding of the topic

q              Addresses all aspects of the task

q              Shows ability to analyze, evaluate issues

q              Includes relevant facts, examples, and details, but not support all aspects of the “case”

q              Presents an organized “case”

 

Earned a Grade of 2

q              Presents satisfactory understanding of the topic           

q              Addresses most aspects of the task

q              Able to analyze issues and events, but not in depth

q              Uses some relevant facts, examples, and details

q              Presents “case”, but not very organized

 

Earned a Grade of 1

¨     Shows little understanding of topic

¨     Attempts to address topic, but uses vague information

¨     Uses little facts, examples, or details

¨     Cannot present an acceptable “case”

 

 

Standards

 

English Language Arts Standards

E1C – Read and comprehend informational materials

E2A – Produce a report of information

 

Social Studies Standards

SS5 – Civics, Citizenship, and Government – Students will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of the necessity for establishing governments, the governmental system of the United States and other nations; the United States Constitution, the basic civic values of American constitutional democracy; and the roles, rights and responsibilities of citizenship, including avenues of participation.

 

From http://www.nycenet.edu/teachlearn/standards/

 

 

V. CONCLUSION:

 

You have now completed your WebQuest.  You are now an expert on the case of Brown v. Board of Education and the issue of students’ rights.  You have extracted the legal principles in Brown and applied them to a real-world situation.  You are now also aware of the ways in which lawyers can use precedents to defend their clients.

 

 

*****APPENDIX*****

 

 

***HERE IS SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CONSIDER,

 AS DISCUSSED IN CLASS***

AIM: DID USSC'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS BLACKS CHANGE FROM 1896 to 1954?

I.O.: SWBAT

      1. read and analyze the Cases of Plessey-v-Ferguson and Brown-v-

         Board of Education

      2. compare the decisions in the cases and examine how the court's

         attitude towards blacks changed

   3.take and defend a position as to whether or not American

     attitudes towards blacks changed from 1896 - 1954

MOT.: “Good fences make good neighbors.”  What do you think this statement means?

 

I) BLACKS AND THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

 A) PLESSEY-v-FERGUSON

A) WHAT WAS THE CASE OF PLESSEY-v-FERGUSON ABOUT?

  1. read case on ditto # 1

B) HOW WOULD YOU DECIDE THIS CASE? WHY?

  2. read decision

 B) BROWN -v- BOARD OF EDUCATION

C) WHAT WAS THE CASE OF BROWN -v- EDUCATION ABOUT?

  1. read case on ditto # 2

D) HOW WOULD YOU DECIDE THIS CASE? WHY?

  2. read decision

E) IS THE DECISION IN THE BROWN CASE DIFFERENT FROM PLESSEY OR THE  

   SAME?  EXPLAIN.

F.S.: DID THE USSC'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS BLACKS CHANGE FROM 1896 to 1954

APP.: WHAT IS THE ATTITUDE OF THE COURTS TOWARDS BLACKS TODAY?

 

JAMES MONROE HIGH SCHOOL                 SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT

ACADEMY FOR BUSINESS AND LAW             B. HERRERO, PRINCIPAL

H6$ AIM: SEGREGATION:                    T. THOMAS, A.P. SUPERVISION

PLESSEY-v-FERGUSON, BROWN-v-BOARD OF EDUCATION

 

PLESSEY-v-FERGUSON

 

     Blacks who hoped for federal protection received little help from the Supreme Court. In the Civil Rights Cases in 1883, the Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment prevented state governments, but not private businesses, from discriminating by race. In 1896, the Court went even further in legalizing racism.

     Jim Crow laws were passed in Louisiana. One law required separate

railroad facilities for blacks and whites. The railroad and civil rights groups wanted to challenge the constitutionality of this law. As a test case, Homer Adolph Plessey, a mulatto, sat in an all white car. He was arrested and found guilty of violating the law. The case was appealed all the way up to the United States Supreme Court. The case dealt with a Constitutional conflict. Did a state's right to pass legislation (reserved power in the 10th Amendment) violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

 

DECISION:

 

     The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Louisiana's law. The Court stated that segregation was lawful as long as blacks and whites had access to equal facilities. They also said that separate but equal accommodations...[was a]... reasonable use of state power."  This became known as the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Court offered this explanation: "If one race be inferior to the other socially, the Constitution of the United states cannot put them on the same plane." The actual equality of black and white railroad cars was never considered. This legal way of looking at racial discrimination remained in effect until 1954.

     One member of the Supreme Court disagreed with the decision in Plessey-v-Ferguson.  Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote, "Our Constitution is colorblind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens...The thin disguise of 'equal' accommodations...will not mislead anyone." Indeed, segregation had become a thin disguise for reducing blacks to the status of second-class citizens.

 

 

 

 

 

JAMES MONROE HIGH SCHOOL                 SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT

ACADEMY FOR BUSINESS AND LAW             B. HERRERO, PRINCIPAL

BROWN-v-BOARD OF EDUCATION               T. THOMAS, A.P. SUPERVISION

    

The major legal obstacle facing blacks in the struggle for equality with whites was the decision in the case of Plessey-v-Ferguson. The Plessey decision said that states could segregate public facilities as long as the separate facilities were equal for both races. In practice, blacks rarely enjoyed public facilities equal to those of whites.

Charles Houston, head of Howard University, traveled all over the South to gather evidence to prove this.  He found that for every dollar southern states spent on educating a black child, they spent five to educate a white child.  Civil rights lawyers used this evidence to show that segregation made the races separate and unequal. They won some cases and a few states had to improve their "colored" schools. But in the 1940's the NAACP believed the best way to fight legal segregation was to attack Plessey head on. Their efforts paid off in one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the twentieth century.

     Though the case involved several black school children, it got its name from just one nine year old Linda Brown of Topeka Kansas. Linda went to an all black elementary school across town. Her parents believed she should have the right to go to the white school closer to home.

Racially segregated schools could never be equal, the lawyers argued, because segregation degraded black children. It taught young blacks that white society considered them inferior, not worthy of mixing with the white children. After studying years of testimony in dozens of related cases, the Supreme Court agreed. To overturn Plessey and outlaw segregation, however, the NAACP lawyers had to persuade the justices of another point. They had to show that the separate schools were unequal--BY DEFINITION.

 

DECISION

 

     It was May 17, 1954 and civil rights backers rejoiced. The Supreme

Court had outlawed racial segregation in public schools.

     The Court agreed that most black schools were worse than those provided for whites. Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the Court's decision. He stated, "To separate [black children] from others of similar age...solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority...that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone."

     The decision was a triumph for legal equality. But it is one thing to make a new law and another thing to enforce it. The Brown decision struck down legal segregation without clearly saying when or how schools had to desegregate. The Brown decision ordered forced racial segregation to be abolished. The mere act of separation itself violated the "equal protection of the law" as guaranteed all Americans by the Fourteenth Amendment.

 

 

 

RESULTS

 

     In reality, few schools integrated students. Governors of some Southern states refused to carry out the Court's orders. Large hostile crowds of whites kept black students out of all white schools. Many Southerners said the Federal government had no power to decide local school matters. The principle of federalism was once more at the heart of a controversy.  Education had always been a reserved power of the states. Most schools remained segregated through the 1950's.