A WebQuest by: Mr. J. Edwards Herbert H. Lehman H.S.
|
Since the 1970's there has been a precipitous increase in
the number of Americans entering the criminal justice system. As the
nearby chart shows, it took over two hundred years for Today, the prison debate has become even more important as problems with overcrowding, abuse, and safety have produced a population of people more dangerous than when they entered the system. As a public policy analyst your charge is to research and develop other possible ways of addressing or problems with our current prison system. The solutions that you develop will then be related to our local congressional leader. |
Task: |
Divided into groups of no more than four, you will use the
provided links to sites for collecting information - and/or use sites of your
own - to complete the worksheets listed below and develop feasible solutions
to the prison problem. |
Process: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working in groups of four, you will: |
|
C. Using the research and solutions you have developed, each member of the group will write a 2 page paper, using the format outlined in the task, outlining your original solution and the steps and thought taken to lead you to your solution. Paper should follow the format described below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Evaluation: |
|
25-20 |
19-14 |
13-8 |
7-0 |
Max Score |
Your Score |
Work Sheets |
All questions were answered completely and rationales for the answers were clearly stated. No grammatical errors/ well polish/ cover page was used *Problem well identified and thoroughly researched *All six steps of the PPA are thoroughly addressed and all worksheets correctly completed.
|
All questions were answered completely, but rationales for the all the answers were not clearly stated. Some grammatical errors, but didn’t disrupt the meaning of the Problem identified and reasonably well researched
*All six steps of the PPA are addressed, most worksheets correctly completed
|
Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 rationales for the all answers were not clearly stated. Problem identified with limited research.
*All steps of the PPA are addressed, but worksheets could be improved on
|
All questions were not answered completely. Problem identified but research is lacking
*Incomplete worksheets
|
25 |
|
Task |
All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought. Well organized, demonstrates logical sequencing and sentence structure
|
At least one area of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought. Well organized, but demonstrates illogical sequencing or sentence structure.
|
At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a moderate level of thought. Well organized, but illogical sequencing and sentence structure.
|
The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task. *Weakly organized
|
25 |
|
Public Policy/ Solution Originality
|
The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality.
|
The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea.
|
The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality |
There were no original ideas expressed in this project.
|
25 |
|
Grammar, Format , and Spelling
|
The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
|
The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. |
The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
|
The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.
|
25 |
|
Conclusion: Congratulations, you should have completed the webquest. As this is the case you should come away from this with a much stronger understanding of the criminal justice system as a whole, and those that have an influence on it. Perhaps you have found that the current system is working well as it stands, or you have developed some interesting alternatives. Most importantly you are now armed with an opinion that is based on factual evidence. |