Webquest
Mental Health Issues
Dr. DeMarie
Introduction:
You are a leading academic expert on mental illness and its
effects on society who also suffers from a diagnosable mental illness. You are part of a government task force will
evaluate existing policies on mental health issues and make recommendations to
revise existing policies or formulate new ones . Your input (in the form of a public policy
analysis-PPA) is critical for the formation of a policy to deal more effectively
with mental illness. You will select a
mental health condition,
describe what is known about the causes and treatments for the condition, how
it impacts individuals, families, and local and national communities. You will
suggest the best ways to manage the condition and to minimize negative impacts
on individual quality of life and on our society by focusing on one
public policy issue that affects the mentally ill.
In order to communicate your ideas effectively, you need to
be well informed about the condition you choose.
Task:
Your study group has an important task to undertake. You
must develop a convincing report for high level policy makers concerning your
condition and offer realistic ideas for public policies. To achieve this goal
your group will use the TIPS Public Policy Analyst steps to develop your policy
recommendations. Your recommendations will have to be well researched in order
to be convincing – many people, including yourself, depend upon the development
of effective public policies to deal with these conditions.
Process
Your group will prepare a public policy analysis (PPA) by:
2.
Gathering Evidence of the extent of the problem
3.
Identifying the Causes of the Problem
4.
Evaluating the Existing Policies to deal with the
Problem
1.
Select a condition and familiarize yourself
with its causes, symptoms, prognosis, and treatments.
2.
Prepare a written report that includes the
above information on the condition and your assessment of how seriously it
impacts society. Your report also must include
a policy you have developed to deal with the condition to improve the lives of
those with it and improve their functioning so as to benefit our society.
Develop a poster that would be useful for a public agency that is trying to
educate people about the condition so as to counteract stereotypes and to
better cope with the condition.
3.
Present your work before the class (oral
presentation) and effectively explain and defend your suggested policy. All members of the group must participate for
each group member to receive full credit.
Review the steps of the Public Policy Analyst (PPA). You need to follow these steps and complete
all six worksheets in order to develop a rational and potentially effective
policy. These steps and worksheets may be viewed at:
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/TIPS/select.html
Resources:
The following links provide information on specific
diseases and newly emergent diseases in general. Feel free to use links within these sites to
find more information as well as to utilize other sites out of the many informative
websites on the internet relating to mental health issues.
Various mental disorders: www.nimh.hih.gov/
Advocacy and various disorders: www.nami/org/
Depression: www.depression.org
Bipolar disorder: www.bipolar.about.com
Panic disorder and anxiety disorders: www.algy.com/anxiety
Schizophrenia: www.schizophrenia.com
Adolescent mental illness: www.aacap.org/
Mental Illness in Workplace and School: www.bu.edu.sarpsych/jobschool/
Mental Illness in parents: www.couns.uiuc.edu/brochures/parents.htm
History of mental illness in the
Creativity and mental disorder linkage: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031001061055.htm
Evaluation:
Each group will receive a grade which applies to each
member. Each group will be graded on
their written report, presentation, and poster. The average of these three
grades will be the group's (and individuals in that group) project grade.
Rubric: Point values from 1 (poor) to 4 (outstanding) are
assigned for each category and then added, and an average is computed for the
grade. The criteria for these point
grades in each category are explained below.
Written Report:
1 2
3 4
PPA analysis |
3 or less PPA steps present |
5 or less steps present |
All steps present, but one or more weak |
All steps accounted for and done well |
Research and Content |
Minimal research, poor information, minimal or no policy |
Some research but very weak information presented to back
up policy |
Research minimally sufficient to address the problem and
the information supports the policy |
Solid research which is evidenced by comprehensive
information which strongly supports the policy |
Grammar and Spelling |
More than 10 errors |
More than 5 errors |
More than 1 error |
No errors |
Logical Thought and Policy Development |
No originality and no or poor logical thought |
Minimal originality and some logical thought |
Some originality and evidence of logical thought |
Originality and logical thought processes are clearly
evident |
Presentation:
1 2
3 4
Group dynamics |
Obvious lack of participation by all group members except
one |
Two or more group members unable to participate in a
meaningful way |
One group member fails to contribute meaningfully |
All group members participate fully in the presentation |
Organization |
Weak to none |
Fair but lacking in coordination between group members |
Good, showing evidence of good prior planning |
|
Content |
Weak content fails to support policy |
Content sufficient to weakly support policy |
Content sufficient to support policy but fails to engage
other students' interest |
Strong content supports policy, engages other students'
interest |
Poster:
1 2 3 4
Artwork |
2 or less colors used, poor originality |
3 colors used, fair originality |
4 colors used, good originality |
5 or more colors used, shows obvious originality |
Content and Message |
Was not clear |
Message understood, but only after explanation by group
member |
Message and content good |
Message and content clear and compelling |
Science Standards:
S5c Uses evidence from reliable sources to develop
descriptions, explanations, and models, and makes appropriate adjustments and
improvements
S5d Proposes, recognizes, analyzes, considers, and
critiques alternative explanations, and distinguishes between fact and opinion
S5f Works individually and in teams to collect and share
information and ideas
S8a Demonstrates scientific competence by completing
secondary research
S7a Argues from evidence
S7e Communicates in a form suited to the purpose and the
audience
ELA Standard
a |
Independently and habitually demonstrate an understanding
of the rules of the English |
b |
Analyze and subsequently revise work to improve its
clarity and effectiveness. |
Conclusion:
Mental health conditions are extremely common and are a
serious problem for many individuals, their families, and ultimately for
society. How society deals with individuals who suffer from mental disorders
says a lot about what kind of people we are.
Science has made rapid progress in understanding these disorders, but
much remains to be learned. Society has
been slower in developing new ways of thinking about these conditions and
coming up with policies that effectively address this issue in an informed,
cost effective, and compassionate way.
By studying this issue students gain information and develop improved
policies to deal with mental illness. In
so doing students better understand the interactions between science and
stereotypes, ethics and economics, and policy development, which are essential in formulating national strategies to deal
with contemporary challenges to the public welfare.