Webquest
Newly Emergent Diseases
Dr. DeMarie
Introduction:
You are a scientist who specializes in the study of newly
emerging diseases. You have been
selected to be part of a government task force that makes recommendations to
the President of the
In order to communicate your ideas effectively, you need to be well informed about the disease you choose. The President and his advisors can and will ask you to provide information about your disease and to defend your suggested policies.
Task:
Your study group has an important
task to undertake. You must develop a convincing report for the President and
high level policy makers concerning the disease you are researching and offer
realistic solutions. To achieve this goal your group will use the TIPS Public
Policy Analyst steps to develop your policy recommendations. Your
recommendations will have to be well researched in order to be convincing –
millions of lives depend upon the development of effective public policies to
deal with these diseases.
Process
Your group will prepare a public policy analysis (PPA) by:
1. Select a disease and familiarize yourself with its causes, symptoms, prognosis, and treatments.
2. Prepare
a written report that includes the above information on the disease and your
assessment of how serious a threat it is to the
3. Develop a poster that would be useful for a public agency that is trying to educate people on how to prevent or deal with the disease.
4. Present your work before the class (oral presentation) and effectively explain and defend your suggested policy. All members of the group must participate for each group member to receive full credit.
Review the steps of the Public Policy Analyst (PPA). You need to follow these steps and complete
all six worksheets in order to develop a rational and potentially effective
policy. These steps and worksheets may be viewed at:
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/TIPS/select.html
Resources:
The following links provide information on specific diseases and newly emergent diseases in general. Feel free to use links within these sites to find more information.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/sars/ SARS
http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/warnings/sars/index.html SARS
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/spb/mnpages/dispages/ebola.htm Ebola
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/monkeypox/factsheet.htm Monkeypox
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/lyme/index.htm Lyme
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/overview/disease-facts.asp Smallpox
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/anthrax_g.htm Anthrax
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hanta/hps/index.htm Hantavirus
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/spb/mnpages/dispages/lassaf.htm Lassa Fever
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/spb/mnpages/dispages/marburg.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dpd/parasites/chagasdisease/factsht_chagas_disease.htm Chagas Disease
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dpd/parasites/schistosomiasis/factsht_schistosomiasis.htm Bilharzia
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/eid/index.htm Newly emerging infectious diseases
Evaluation:
Each group will receive a grade
which applies to each member. Each group
will be graded
on their written report, presentation, and poster. The average of these three
grades will be the group's (and individuals in that group) project grade.
Rubric: Point values from 1 (poor)
to 4 (outstanding) are assigned for each category and then added, and an
average is computed for the grade. The
criteria for these point grades in each category are explained below.
Written Report:
1 2 3 4
PPA analysis |
3 or less PPA steps present |
5 or less steps present |
All steps present, but one or
more weak |
All steps accounted for and done
well |
Research and Content |
Minimal research, poor
information, minimal or no policy |
Some research but very weak
information presented to back up policy |
Research minimally sufficient to
address the problem and the information supports the policy |
Solid research which is
evidenced by comprehensive information which strongly supports the policy |
Grammar and Spelling |
More than 10 errors |
More than 5 errors |
More than 1 error |
No errors |
Logical Thought and Policy
Development |
No originality and no or poor
logical thought |
Minimal originality and some
logical thought |
Some originality and evidence of
logical thought |
Originality and logical thought
processes are clearly evident |
Presentation:
1 2 3
4
Group dynamics |
Obvious lack of participation by
all group members except one |
Two or more group members unable
to participate in a meaningful way |
One group member fails to
contribute meaningfully |
All group members participate
fully in the presentation |
Organization |
Weak to none |
Fair but lacking in coordination
between group members |
Good, showing evidence of good
prior planning |
|
Content |
Weak content fails to support
policy |
Content sufficient to weakly
support policy |
Content sufficient to support
policy but fails to engage other students' interest |
Strong content supports policy,
engages other students' interest |
Poster:
1 2 3 4
Artwork |
2 or less colors used, poor
originality |
3 colors used, fair originality |
4 colors used, good originality |
5 or more colors used, shows
obvious originality |
Content and Message |
Was not clear |
Message understood, but only
after explanation by group member |
Message and content good |
Message and content clear and
compelling |
Science Standards:
S5c Uses evidence from reliable sources to develop descriptions, explanations, and models, and makes appropriate adjustments and improvements
S5d Proposes, recognizes, analyzes, considers, and critiques alternative explanations, and distinguishes between fact and opinion
S5f Works individually and in teams to collect and share information and ideas
S8a Demonstrates scientific competence by completing secondary research
S7a Argues from evidence
S7e Communicates in a form suited to the purpose and the audience
ELA Standard
a |
Independently and habitually
demonstrate an understanding of the rules of the English |
b |
Analyze and subsequently revise
work to improve its clarity and effectiveness. |
Conclusion:
Newly emergent diseases are a
potentially serious problem which already has threatened the