Ms.
Choudhary
INTRODUCTION
How many times have you said to
your teachers, parents or friends, “It’s a free country, I can say what ever I
want”, or when you are asked to obey and follow a school rule that you don’t feel
is just, you scream out, “But that’s not fair” and so on and so forth.
Would you believe that not so very long ago in a mid western town of
Des Moines, two young children of ages 13 and 16 were suspended for disobeying
a school rule that forbade anyone from wearing an armband as a symbol of war protest?
“But that’s not fair”, said the
Tinkers. John and Mary Beth Tinkers and their parents took this matter all the
way to the Supreme Court of
Who do you think won the battle?
Should the Tinkers be allowed to break a school rule and get away with it?
Should the school have a right to restrict students from creating uproar or
inciting unrest? To learn more about the entire case go to CompuLegal
Internet site and explore.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/tinker.html
TASK:
Your task is to
travel back in time to 1965 and reenact this historical event through
role-play.
You will research the case using CompuLEGAL; select a role for yourself
and then each side, the Tinkers and the School Officials will present their
case orally to a panel of judges. Each member of the team will present his or
her view orally, providing at least two reasons, based on the facts, to support
their views. Make sure you use the facts and issue questions to help you organize your
thoughts.
As a group you
will be required to submit one to two pages typed written paper. This could be
used as your group's final summation or argument presented to the judges. Make
sure you include at least two prior court cases and their decisions to support
your argument. Don't forget to ask help from "Ask-A LEGAL Eagle", if you need further clarification on the law.
PROCESS:
1) Discuss and brainstorm: What is freedom of speech? How many ways
one can express his/her opinion? What constitutes a symbolic speech?
2) You will use the following
Internet sites to learn more about Freedom on Speech. You will use this new
information to give your opinion and discuss in small groups.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/tips/bor.html
http://www.landmarkcases.org/tinker/symbolicspeech.html
3) You will then select a role to play. You may volunteer for a
role. If not enough volunteers then roles will be assigned by a draw, pick a
name from the hat.
The roles to select from are:
·
John Tinker, age 13
·
Mary Beth Tinker, age 16Mr. Tinker, Father
·
Mrs. Tinker, Mother
·
High School Principal
·
Middle School Principal
·
Elementary School Principal
·
School Superintendent
·
2 lawyers for the defendants
·
2 lawyers for the School Board
·
3 to 5 students (either supporting Tinkers or School Board,
depending on your view points)
4) You will then form two groups, the Tinkers and the
a) What are the main reasons
for your opinion?
b) What legal basis do
you have to stand your ground?
c) This case involved a conflict between freedom
of speech and the need for order. Can you think of other situations in school
in which these values could conflict?
5) Meet with your group at least 5 times. Every member of the team
must help the lawyers in writing their final arguments. Your written
composition should be grammatically correct. It must site at least two other
similar court cases to support your argument.
6) Each person must orally present their viewpoint to a panel of
justices. The panel will consist of three guest teachers/judges.
7) Your oral presentation will be judged on how clearly and persuasively
you speak. Speak in complete grammatically correct sentences, and must state
two reasons to support your point of view.
8) You must exhibit the use of various hyperlink resources provided
for your quest.
RESOURCES:
Here are some
Internet sites to assist you in your research. Just click on it to get there
and visit as often as you need to.
Check out this CompuLEGAL site for full case information.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/tinkerfacts.html
Check out the next
two sites for good visual information on Tinker case.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/tinkervis1.html
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/tinkervis2.html
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/TIPS/resres.html
If you wish to
learn about how the court system works go to:
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/court.html
EVALUATION:
Your
grades will be divided in two parts. Your oral presentation will comprise of
the 60% of your grade and group written work of 40%.
Student evaluation will be based upon
the following criteria:
·
Effort and initiative
·
Teamwork
·
Role play presentation and debrief
·
Written argument provided by the group
We will use the following
rubric to arrive at your grade.
Category |
Grade A |
Grade B |
Grade C |
Grade D |
Total |
Written
report |
Shows
understanding of the topic. Uses correct grammar and spelling. Writes in
complete sentences. Also sites two other similar court cases to support the
argument. |
Shows a good
understanding of the topic. Uses correct grammar and spelling most of the
time. Writes well organized sentences. And sites only one other court case to
support the argument. |
Presents
satisfactory understanding of the topic. Misspells words, poor grammar. Some
sentences and paragraphs are not well structured. And does not site any other
case to support the argument. |
Shows little
understanding of the topic. Report lacks proper grammar usage. Poor
organizational skills. Sentences lack structure. And presents no legal
arguments in support of the case. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Role-Play
Presentation |
Presents a
strong and well-organized case or point of view. States two reasons to
support his/her point of view. Speaks loudly and clearly. Uses proper
English. |
Presents point
of view and is organized. States at least one reason to support his/her point
of view. Uses proper English. Explains most of the case well. |
Presents
weak point of view but is not well organized. States no reason in support of
his/her point of view. Speaks using a low tone of voice. Does not explain the
case very well. |
Point of
view is very weak and lacks organization. Exhibits little to no understanding
of the case. Displays inaudible speech. Speaks in short phrases or single
word utterances. |
|
Standards:
Social
Studies: S5 Civics, citizenship and government.
English: E1
Students will read and write, listen and speak for information and
understanding.
E2.
Students will read and write, listen and speak critically for literary response
and expression.
E3.
Students will read and write, listen and speak for critical analysis and
evaluation.
CONCLUSION:
The freedom of speech is not only an expression of your opinion by
speaking your mind or writing and publishing, but also can be symbolic. The
Tinkers did it by wearing an armband to express their opposition to war. Do you
feel that you can also express your opinion by what you wear?
Have you ever
worn any garment that spoke out loudly, "Hey!
It’s me… or I stand for this cause…etc.". If a
young Muslim woman wears a "Hijab" (a head scarf) to display her
religious conviction, or you wear a Yankee hat to show that you are a Yankee
fan or some times people wear a black band around their arm to show that they
are grieving for someone dear. We can safely draw a conclusion that symbols are
as powerful of expression as any spoken or written words.