Lenora Zeitchick
Walton H.S.
A search
warrant is an order signed by a judge that allows the police to look in a
specific place for a specific item at a specific time. In order to get a search
warrant, the police must persuade a judge that they have "probable
cause" to believe they will find evidence of criminal activity in the
place to be searched. Police officers do this through an affidavit, which is an
oral or written statement made under oath. In the affidavit, they identify the
place to be searched, the reason it is to be searched, and the items that are
to be seized. If a judge believes that a police officer has demonstrated
"probable cause" that he will find the items, the judge will issue
the search warrant. If the judge does not believe that "probable
cause" exists he will not issue the warrant
One night,
seven police officers broke into and searched Dolly Mapp's
home in
Process
1. Students will form self-selected groups. . In
groups students will explore the actions, determine the values and examine the
legal bases of the case.
2. Students will use Comp Legal. to study Due Process.
Students will complete the worksheets on the web site.
Students will use these worksheets and the Internet sites given in the
“Resource” section of the Webquest to complete the
“Task”.
Students view the Mapp Facts OF THE CASE.
Students view the Mapp Visual.
Students will fill in the Mapp: Facts & Issue Question chart.
Students will read the Mapp: Reasoning OF THE CASE.
Students will read the Mapp Arguments OF THE CASE.
Students will read the Mapp Decision.
TASK
Respond to one or more of the following questions in a
thoughtful essay of a minimum of 250 words. Use MS word to write your final
draft
1. What
issues and values are involved in search and seizure?
2. Can
you relate to the situation as depicted in the case?
3. What
implications are there in the outcome?
4. How
might you have responded in a similar situation?
5.
What do you predict the outcome of this case will be?
6. Do
you agree?
7.
What additional arguments might be applicable?
8.
What are the future implications?
9. Do
you think employers need a warrant to search employees’ desks to investigate
work-related conduct? Why or why not?
10.
Should students have the same rights as adults? Support your position.
11. Why do you think these cases involving “search
warrants” and “due process” have important ramifications? Cite some examples
from your own experiences.
To be completed by the
police officer based on testimony from the witness(es)
In each of the situations below, a police
officer does not need a search warrant to conduct a search.
1. If an individual voluntarily consents (agrees to) a search,
no warrant is needed. The key question in this kind of search is what counts as
a voluntary agreement? In order for a consent
search to be legal, the individual must be in control of the area to be
searched and cannot have been pressured or tricked into agreeing to the search.
2. A police officer that spots something in plain view does not
need a search warrant to seize the object. In order for a plain view search to be legal, the
officer must be in a place he has the right to be in and the object he seizes
must be plainly visible in this location.
3. If a suspect has been legally arrested, the police may
search the defendant and the area within the defendant's immediate control. In
a search incident to arrest no
warrant is necessary as long as a spatial relationship exists between the
defendant and the object.
4. Following an arrest, the police may make a protective sweep search if they
reasonably believe that a dangerous accomplice may be hiding in an area near
where the defendant was arrested. To do so, police are allowed to walk through
a residence and complete a "cursory visual inspection" without a
warrant. If evidence of or related to a criminal activity is in plain view
during the search, the evidence may be legally seized.
5. If the police stop a car based on probable cause, they can
search for objects related to the reason for the stop without obtaining a
warrant. During a car search, the police are also allowed to frisk the subject
for weapons, even without a warrant if they have reasonable suspicion that the
suspects may be involved in illegal activities.
Directions: You will be given an index card with an "L" on
one side and an "I" on the other. The "L" stands for LEGAL.
The "I" stands for ILLEGAL. Your teacher will read aloud a scenario
in which the police did not have a search warrant. You will have 10 seconds to
decide, based on the information above, whether the search/seizure was legal or
illegal. When the teacher says "go", raise your index card,
displaying the "L" if you think the search was legal or the
"I" if you think the search was illegal. Be prepared to explain and
defend your answer.
|
Scenario |
Is this search Legal or Illegal? |
If it's legal, cite the reason using the underlined words from items 1-5 above. If it's illegal, explain. |
1 |
At the local shopping mall, an undercover detective notices a group of teenagers shopping together. Following them, he observes no illegal behavior. However, once they exit the mall he stops them and orders them to turn over their purses, wallets, and jackets. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
2 |
Using a valid arrest warrant, police arrest a woman for running a drug ring out of her house. Believing that her boss, one of the biggest drug dealers in the country, may be hiding inside the house, they walk through the house looking for him. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
3 |
Officer Jones is trying to find a convict who escaped from a nearby jail. Going door-to-door in the neighborhood surrounding the jail, he asks permission to enter each house and search it. The Nguyen's allow him to enter their house. Once in the house, the officer sees and seizes an unregistered firearm that is on a bookshelf. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
4 |
In a neighborhood well known for producing methamphetamines, the police have a warrant to search the basement of one home to find a production lab. Finding nothing in the basement, they perform a protective sweep search on the rest of the house. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
5 |
While chaperoning a high-school football game, police in |
|
|
6 |
Jody and Chandra attend a keg party where all of those drinking were under age. The police break up the party without arresting anyone. They seize Jody's purse. Inside, they find marijuana and arrest Jody for possession. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
7 |
Late for work, Diego was driving five miles over the speed limit when pulled over by the police. Ordering Diego out of the car, the police proceed to frisk him and find a small weapon in his jacket pocket. Is this search legal or illegal? |
|
|
In the activity that
follows, you will walk through the process of obtaining a search warrant.
1. The class will be divided into groups of two and will give
each group a scenario to read. (Some groups will have the same scenario.) Each
student will be assigned one to one of
the following roles:
§
Police Officer
§
Witness
2. The police officer and witnesses read the scenario and will
answer the questions that follow the scenario.
3. The police officer will interview the witness, who will
describe any "suspicious behavior" she has seen to the police
officer. (In some scenarios, the witness will play more than one role). The
information in the scenario provided will serve as a basis for the witnesses,
but she may embellish the details as appropriate. If the situation merits a
request for a search warrant, the police officer will complete an
"Application and Affidavit for a Search Warrant". If the situation
does not merit a request for a search warrant, members of the scenario should
discuss why.
4. Each group of two will now form a group of four with another
set of partners. The "witnesses" will trade places and will now serve
as judges. If the lawyer has an affidavit to submit, she will give it to the
judge. If not, she will explain to the judge why she did not submit one.
5. The judge will review the "Application and Affidavit
for a Search Warrant" and determine whether or not there is probable cause
for a warrant. (At this point, it would be helpful to have the assistance of
the community resource person.) The judge will complete the first page of the
search warrant form explaining why or what additional information he would need
in order to grant the request.
6. Each group will present the outcome of its scenario to the
class and will explain what transpired and why. The community resource person
can assist in the discussion.
Follow-up
Questions:
1. In which scenarios did the police officers request a search
warrant?
2. In which scenarios did the judge issue a search warrant?
3. Why were warrants issued in some cases but not in others?
4. In situations where warrants were not issued, how did the
police obtain evidence?
Can you apply what you have learned?
Questions for Thought
Complete your project, defending your position, from Mapp’s point of view.
Show
what you have learned by creating an original piece of work in the form of a PowerPoint
presentation, an art project or photo journal, a poem, a cartoon,
a diorama, an oral presentation, a letter to an official,
a role play, or an editorial. Your project may be done
individually or as a group.
RESOURCES
http://www.secure.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.amendmentxiv.html
Search Warrants: What Are They and How Do They Work?, Mapp v. Ohio, Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Teaching Recommendations Based on Your Time, Mapp v. Ohio, Landmark Supreme Court Cases
http://ali.apple.com/ali_media/Users/111/files/others/fourthamend.pdf
Standards
SOCIAL STUDIES 1 & 5
EVALUATION
Category |
Grade A |
Grade B |
Grade C |
Grade D |
Written report |
Shows
understanding of the topic. Uses
correct grammar and spelling. Writes in completes sentences. |
Shows a good understanding of
the topic. Uses correct grammar and spelling most of the time. Writes well
organized sentences. |
Presents satisfactory
understanding of the topic. Misspells words, poor grammar. Some sentences and
paragraphs are not well structured. |
Shows little understanding of
the topic. Report lacks proper grammar
usage. Poor organizational
skills. Sentences lack structure. |
Completion of the
task. |
Addresses all aspects of the
task. |
Addresses all aspects of the
task. |
Addresses most aspects of the
task. |
Attempts to address topic, but
uses vague and /or inaccurate information |
Facts about the cases. |
Richly supports topic with
relevant facts, examples and details |
Includes relevant facts,
examples and details, but not support all aspects of the case |
Uses some relevant facts,
examples and details. |
Uses little facts, examples,
or details. |
Role-Play Presentation |
Presents a strong and
well-organized case or point of view. Speak loud and clear. Use proper English . |
Presents point of view and is
organized. Uses proper English. Explains most of the case well. |
Presents weak point of view
but is not well organized. Speaks
using a low tone of voice. Does not
explain the case very well. |
Point of view is very weak and lacks organization |
Conclusion
This case is centered on search and seizure. By
completing this WebQuest you have used CompuLegal to
research the concept of due process through the Supreme Court case Mapp v