By Dezeng
Pang
E-mail: Dzpang@hotmail.com
On
Ř
You will take a position on the issue.
Ř
You will read the case Korematsu v.
Ř
You will write a brief explaining the facts of the case.
Ř
You will analyze the facts of the case using the CompuLegal System
Ř
You will research cases,
which set a precedent
for this case.
Ř
You will examine the arguments of the case.
Ř
Your group will write a report for an oral presentation
defending your position.
1. The
class will be divided into 3 groups: one group of students will act as Supreme Court
justices, the second one will represent Korematsu who
thinks it is unconstitutional to be forced to leave his home and the third one
will represent the government. To support your arguments, you have to review
some Supreme Court cases. The cases can be examined through the CompuLegal
system. This system will help you review the cases step by step.
2. You will
search through the resources below to gain additional knowledge about the topic.
3. Two groups
will write the reports in which there should be strong legal reasons to support
your opinions. Then present your case in front of the “Supreme Court”.
4. The “Supreme
Court” group should discuss and reach an agreement, and write the ruling based
on a legal basis. After this, you will read your decision to the class.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/korematsu.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/index.html
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/dcales/instruct1.html
http://bss.sfsu.edu/internment/Congressional%20Records/19880420b.html
Students
will be evaluated based on the following criteria: effort, group work,
presentation and written work.
Excellent
1. Student
shows a complete understanding of the research topic.
2. Student
provides facts and opinions with supporting details.
3. Student
shows the ability to analyze, evaluate, and apply critical thinking skills to
information.
4. Student
participates in group process.
5. Student
submits complete written project.
Good
1. Student shows a
satisfactory understanding of the research topic.
2. Student
provides facts and opinions with supporting details.
3. Student shows
the ability to analyze and evaluate information.
4. Student
participates in group process.
5. Student submits
written work.
Need Improvement
1. Student shows a
minimal understanding of the research topic.
2. Student provides
minimal facts and opinions.
3. Student shows
the poor ability to analyze and evaluate information.
4. Student has
difficulty participating in group process.
5. Student submits
incomplete written project.
Upon the completion of this WebQuest, you
have used CompuLegal to search some legal issues and
reviewed some cases involved in civil rights. Then, you have used the
information to analyze the case Korematsu v. U.S.
in your group. Then you have written
reports and presented them to the lass. Now you can utilize technological
research and critical thinking skills you have acquired during this process.
You may further explore this issue or other issues that interest you.