Genetically Modified Foods

        `                                                     

Christopher Columbus High School                        

Genetics - Webquest

E. Lee

 

                                                                                                                                                                                         

                                                                        

                                      

 

  Introduction:   

                                    

Genetically modified foods (GMF) have been dubbed as “Frankenstein foods” by critics who fear they could pose dangers to human health or the environment. Since 1994, GM crops have become common in the American supermarket and diet. Many of these plants contain genes from other organisms. Genetic modification has the potential to offer very significant improvements in the quantity and quality of the world’s food supply. However, there are concerns about the development and use of these genetic altered foods. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has commissioned you to form a research team to investigate whether GM food is safe for human consumption.  Your team will assess the benefits and the risks of food biotechnology for an upcoming conference with the president. Based on your team’s research you’ll need to convince the president of your viewpoint.

 

 

Task:
In this WebQuest you will be working together with a team of 3 other students and each individual from your team will play one of the roles listed below. (Environmentalist, Scientist, Consumer advocate, Legislator) Your team will research the listed resources for your particular role and write a 3-page research paper or a power point presentation with 12 slides. You’ll decide amongst yourselves who will play each role. Each person has a specific role as outlined below:

 

·        Environmentalist - concerned with problems of the environment, especially with crops developed from genetic engineering that may destroy the balance of nature

·        Scientist  - concerned with the risks and benefits of food biotechnology

·        Consumer Advocate - a concerned citizen who is interested in the health risks that GM foods poses

Legislator - concerned with the regulations and legislation such as restrictions, labeling etc. Format of the paper:

 

Your written paper should include all of the following:

                         

§         cover sheet:   including: Topic, Title, Name, Class Section, Due Date, Teacher

§         introduction:  define the social problem and  reasons for public concern

§         body:  viewpoint of each member’s expertise may include  graphs or other statistics

§         conclusion:-  suggest legislation and solutions that will work

bibliography:  create a complete listing of all the materials you used in your research.

 

 Your final task will be to present a 3 minute oral report to the class on you research.

 

   Process:

 

To complete your 3 page report or power point presentation you must use the Public Policy Analyst format found on the website http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/ppa/intro.html  and complete worksheet #4 (Evaluate a policy), #5 (Develop solutions) and #6(Select Best Solutions).  These forms must be submitted as your group finishes them.

Your task is to collect and analyze information from viewpoints from both sides of this hot issue on the website. You will then formulate your own viewpoint in your particular field of expertise. Each member will begin with some background information on how genetically engineered food are produced and include answers to the following questions in your presentation:

 

1.      What are some examples of genetically engineered products?

2.      How are they used and why are they used?

3.      What are the potential benefits of genetically engineered foods?

4.      What are the potential risks of genetically engineered foods?

5.      Do you think the benefits outweigh the risks? Explain why.

6.      Are the present regulations controlling GM foods adequate?       

 

 

Remember you have a reputation to maintain and you must support your statements with data and factual evidences. You are required to follow the steps below:

          Day 1

Research listed websites that pertains to your field of expertise

         Day 2

Write your introduction with your team’s viewpoint

    Day 3

                        Gather evidence:

Select 3 or more of the websites listed to write a page on evidences supporting your viewpoint on the safety of GM foods

          Day 4

Complete worksheet #4: Evaluating Existing Public Policies Evaluating Existing Public Policies in the U.S. as a group regarding restrictions and labeling of GM  foods. This worksheet will help guide you to develop your final public policy.

          Day 5

Complete the following two worksheets as a group. Be sure to

     discuss these answer among yourselves.

                                    Worksheet 5: Developing Public Policy Solutions

                                    Worksheet 6: Selecting the Best Public Policy Solution.

        Day6

                   Write a conclusion supporting your team’s viewpoint.

 

   Resources:

 

Viewpoints:

www.scope.educ.washington.edu/gmfood/   Cached

www.foodfuture.org.uk/   - 2k - Cached

http://www.organicconsumers.org

www.fullcoverage.yahoo.com/fc/Science/ Genetically_Modified_Food/

 - 28k - Cached

GMfood.htm - 14k - Cached

www.tara-source.com/youasked/dspace.dial.pipex.com/srtscot/gmfood1.htm  - 15k - Cached

 

 

Genetically Modified foods Public Policy:

 

www.foodstuff.org/News/OnThePlate/bio-tech.htm  - 10k - Cached

www.chipsbooks.com/genmodag.htm  - 7k - Cached

http://www.usa.or.th/services/irc/bio_fs.htm

www.netlink.de/gen/Zeitung/1999/991024.htm  - 8k - Cached

www.ascb.org/publicpolicy/gmo.htm  - 29k - Cached

 

   

Evaluation:

Grading Guidelines:           

  1- Oral Presentation – 40 points

  2- Research Report – 60 points

 

 

 

Criteria for: Oral Presentation

Points

 

1   (2.5 Pts)

2  (2.5 Pts)

3  (2.5 Pts)

4 (2.5pts)

  Total=10pts.

Organization

Audience cannot understand presentation because it is inaudible.

Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.

Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.

Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.

10___

Content Knowledge

Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.

Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.

Student is at ease with content, but fails to elaborate.

Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required)with explanations and elaboration.

10____

Visuals

Student used no visuals.

Student occasional used visuals that rarely support text and presentation.

Visuals related to text and presentation.

Student used visuals to reinforce screen text and presentation.

10____

 

 

 

 

 .

 

Delivery

Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.

Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.

Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly.

Student used a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms.

10____

 

 

 

 

Total---->

40____

 

 

 

Name: ________________________

Teacher:

Date Submitted: ____________

Title of Work: ___________________

 

 

Criteria – Research Report

Points

 

4

3

2

1

 

Introduction

All questions were answered completely and rationales for the answers were clearly stated.

All questions were answered completely, but rationales for the all the answers were not clearly stated.

Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 rationales for the all answers were not clearly stated.

All questions were not answered completely.

10____

Task

All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought.

At least one area of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought.

At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a moderate level of thought.

The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task.

10____

Process: Teamwork

It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit created the final product.

      (5pts)

The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a better degree.

      (5pts)

The team had problems working together. Little collaboration occurred.

      (5pts)

The final product is not the result of a collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration.          

      (5pts)

20____

 Originality

Proposal

Of Public

Policy;

solutions

The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality.

The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea.

The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality.

There were no original ideas expressed in this project.

 10

Grammar, Format , and Spelling

The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.

The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.

The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.

The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors.

 10

 

 

 

 

Total---->

60____

 

Teacher Comments:

 

 


Powered by TeAch-nology.com- The Web Portal For Educators! (www.teach-nology.com)

 Standards: 

This Web quest meets the following New York State English and

Science Standards.

 

English

 

v     v     E1c:  Read and comprehend informational materials.

v     v     E2a:  Produce a report of information.

v     v     E2e:  Produce a persuasive essay.

v     v     E4b:  Analyze and subsequently revise work to improve its clarity and effectiveness.

 

Science

v     v     S8a: Demonstrates scientific competence by completing secondary research.

v     v     S7b: Argues from evidence.

v     v     S7e: Communications in a form suited to the purpose and the audience.

v     v     S5c: Uses evidence from reliable sources to develop descriptions, explanations, and models; and makes appropriate adjustments and improvements.

v     v     S5d: Proposes, recognizes, analyzes, considers, and critiques alternative explanations; and distinguishes between fact and opinion.

 

 

Conclusion:

       Upon completion of this project, you will have an understanding of the complexity and importance of how public awareness can help implement policies to protect both the environment and well being of the general public. You should have also learned the importance of teamwork and cooperative learning.

Our next Web Quest will deal with the complex social problem of human genetic engineering. This has raised political, social and religious issues that go far beyond the scope of our present legal system.