Introduction: You are one of the six hundred newly recruited
research associates at The Bronx H. S. of Science Research Consortium. As you know we have an ongoing contract with
the
The Task: As a part of your initial training you are to pursue a
scientific topic and become the in house expert on that topic. You are to familiarize yourself with at least
one primary source of scientific information and investigate associated public
policy issues. You are to study the impact
of public policies adopted in the past and make new policy
recommendations. You will be using Public Policy Analyst
to help you through the process. Your
final product will be a Power Point presentation of thirty slides. You will make a ten minute presentation of
your findings and recommendations in front of your peers.
The Process:
Presentation Requirements:
You
will be presenting the work described in the primary source your group has selected.
Your challenges are, first, to understand the primary source and related public
policy issues, and second, to make it understandable and interesting to your
peers. Your presentation must contain the following sections.
1.
Title of your
presentation (not necessarily the title of your paper) and group members
2.
Title, authors,
and affiliations of your primary source article
3.
Abstract – A
brief summary of the entire presentation (no more than 100 words).
4.
Introduction –
Background information about your topic, including information from secondary sources.
Give enough explanation and definitions for your classmates to understand the
experiment and why it was done
5.
The problem and
hypothesis of the experiment
6.
Materials and methods
– An explanation of equipment and procedures.
7.
Results and calculations
– Data and analyses, presented in tables and/or graphs, and summarized in
words.
8.
Discussion and conclusions
– The results compared to the hypothesis and to other work, conclusions, the
limitations of the work, and recommendations for future work.
9.
Public policy
implications – How this experiment relates to societal decisions. Draft a new
or modified public policy statement and present evidence to support your
position
10. Works cited – Your bibliography, including all primary
and secondary sources.
Only
the abstract should be written in complete sentences. All other portions should
use an abbreviated style (e.g., in bullets) suitable for presentations.
Your
Works Cited section and citations in the rest of the presentation must follow
the MLA format, which will be explained in a library session in November. To be
ready, make sure you get complete information (title, authors, magazine,
newspaper, etc.) about all sources.
The
entire group must participate in developing, finalizing, and presenting the
project. You will have some class time to work together, but you will also have
to work outside of class to finish. If you do not have PowerPoint at home, you
may create text using any word processing program, which can be easily imported
into PowerPoint.
Each
member of the group must take a turn speaking during the presentation. Design
your PowerPoint slides so that the student can read the slide aloud, and then
add a few brief comments and/or answer questions. On the day of your
presentation, you must turn in a statement of what each member of the group
contributed to the project, and this will be taken into account in the grading.
Your
peers watching the presentation will be given a rubric with which to grade the
presentation. Their average scores will count towards the final evaluation for
the project.
The Rubric:
|
|
Maximum Points |
Abstract |
|
|
|
Complete |
5 |
|
Well organized
|
5 |
|
Clearly written |
5 |
Introduction |
|
|
|
Background - complete and
correct |
5 |
|
Importance and feasibility of problem and hypothesis |
5 |
|
Originality of problem and
hypothesis |
5 |
Materials and Methods |
|
|
|
Appropriateness of
variables and controls |
5 |
|
Appropriateness of
materials and measurements |
5 |
|
Clarity of presentation |
5 |
Results and Calculations |
|
|
|
Appropriateness of tables,
graphs, etc. |
5 |
|
Clarity of presentation |
5 |
|
Accuracy of analysis |
5 |
Discussion and Conclusions |
|
|
|
Clarity of presentation |
5 |
|
Connection to the study |
5 |
|
Completeness |
5 |
|
|
|
Works Cited |
5 |
|
Overall presentation |
|
|
|
Attractiveness |
5 |
|
Organization and coherence |
5 |
|
Appropriate speaking |
10 |
|
Total |
100 |