KNOWING YOUR RIGHTS
WebQuest
By Teak Bassett
teakbas@yahoo.com
You just left school and are walking to
You are rapping along with the song as you enter the train car.
A cop comes up to you and makes you take off your earphones.
“Hey you’re bothering everybody on the train. Shut up,” the cop
says.
“I ain’t bothering anybody. Leave me alone.”
“Don’t talk back to me. Open your bag.”
“I ain’t opening my bag,” you say and then walk through the
doors into the next subway car.
“Freeze,” the cop screams. He pushes you against the wall and
opens your bag. He finds spray paint and tag stickers in your bag. You are
arrested.
Using CompuLEGAL you have to defend yourself in court. You need
to use the Bill of Rights and past Supreme Court Cases in your defense.
Process:
You will break into groups of three and type a legal argument using
CompuLegal in your defense.
In your argument you must include:
· Four supreme court cases that would favor your argument
· Two amendments from the Constitution
You will have to present this legal document to four judges: two
teachers and two twelfth grade students. The teachers will be representing the
police in your class. After hearing each case, the class will vote and decide
the outcome of the groups depending on each argument. Each group must give a
summary of each Supreme Court case and each amendment used in their argument
and explain how each applies to your case.
Resources:
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/fos.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.table.html
http://lawcrawler.findlaw.com/scripts/lc.pl?entry=Freedom+of+Speech&sites=findlaw
Evaluation:
You will receive two different assessments of your project.
1. Your group
will receive a grade based on the context of your legal document. Did you include
three Supreme Court cases? Did you include two Constitutional amendments? Did
you summarize each of these requirements? Did you apply them to your legal
defense?
2. Your group
will also include a grade on your presentation. Is each member in attendance
during the presentation? Was each member of the group involved in the
presentation? Did each person speak clearly with complete understanding of the
legal defense the group is trying to use? Is each member dressed appropriately
for a presentation? Is there an order to the presentation? Is it clear the
group planned when each member would speak?
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
Supreme Court Cases
|
You have included 0-1
Supreme Court Cases in your argument. |
You have included 2
Supreme Court Cases in your argument. |
You have included 3
Supreme Court Cases in your argument. |
You have included 4
Supreme Court Cases and have used them to defend yourself. |
|
Amendments
|
You have used 0-1
amendments in your argument. |
You have used 2
amendments in your argument. |
You have used 2
amendments and have a clear understanding of those amendments. |
You have used 2
amendments and have applied these amendments to your defense. |
|
Writing
|
Hand-written and
messy. |
Typed with at 10 or
more grammatical mistakes. |
Typed with 5-9
grammatical mistakes. |
Typed with less then
five grammatical mistakes. |
|
Your defense
|
Not able to tie in the
amendments and the Supreme Court cases to prove innocence. |
Used only amendments
or Supreme Court cases, not both, for your defense. |
Used both amendments
and Supreme Court cases, but not able to tie them together. |
Used both Supreme
Court cases and amendments together in your defense. |
|
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
Dress |
Two to three people
in your group are wearing jeans and sneakers. |
Two of the three
people in your group are dressed appropriately (slacks, collared shirt, shoes). |
All three people in
your groups are dressed appropriately (slacks, collared shirt and shoes). |
All three people in
your group are dressed in shirt, tie, and slacks or a dress. |
|
Speaking
|
One to two members of
the group does all the speaking. |
All three members participate
but most of the presentation is mumbled and hard to understand. |
All three members participate
in the presentation. It is clear what points the group is trying to make. |
All three people
participate and the presentation is clear and makes a convincing argument in
their defense. |
|
Organization
|
Students do not have
a clear order as to when each group
member is to speak. |
Students do have an
order in which they are speaking, but they are cutting each other off. |
Students have a clear
order and speak one at a time. |
Students have a clear
order and there is a smooth transition from one to another as they present
their defense. |
|
The verdict
|
The class finds your
argument unconvincing and you are sentenced to jail. |
The class finds your
argument somewhat convincing but you still need to serve jail time. |
The class finds in
your favor and the case is thrown out. |
The class finds in
your favor, the case is thrown out and the police officer is to go to
jail. |
|
Combined score:
The panel of judges will
complete the presentation rubric. The teacher will complete the writing rubric.
30-32: A
27-29: A-
24-26: B
21-23: B-
18-20: C
15-17: C-
12-15: D
Below 12 is an F
ANYONE RECEIVING A GRADE OF 17 OR LOWER MUST RE-DO THEIR
PROJECT.
Conclusion:
The police are constantly violating our rights under the
constitution. They try to intimidate teenagers because the police assume
teenagers do not know their rights. It is important that all people know their
rights so that if they are ever unjustly arrested they will have the
information necessary to protect themselves in court.
Some questions to think about:
Why do you think the founding fathers attached the Bill of
Rights to the Constitution?
Can you think of a situation where people in the wrong can use
the Bill of Rights?
Explain the idea of democracy. Is the Bill of Rights a necessity
in a democracy? Explain.