The Dorismond Case

 

Webquest

by Mario Compos

CIS 229

 

INTRODUCTION

“All men are created equal”  . . . is clearly stated  into the declaration of the Independence. This statement  has been very debatable in relation to the treatment of minorities.  On  March  16, 2000, Patrick Dorismond an  unarmed man was shot to death by Detective Anthony Vasquez as the officer and two others attempted a “buy-and-bust” drug, operation near Penn  Station and Madison Square Garden.

The Police  Commissioner  made an  announcement soon after. One of the officers, (who are all Hispanic), approached  Mr.Dorismond who was black, and another man in front of a bar. “He engaged them in a conversation relative to drugs”said the commissioner.

Patrick  Dorismond 25, was hit in the chest with a bullet and died at the hospital. No drugs were found on his possession.

You  the students, will be asked to do some research based upon race relations not only in the City of New York but also in the entire United States. Expecting your work can lead us to a better understanding of this controversy of race relations  past and  present within the United States.

 

 

TASK

“You will prepare a research document based upon two Past Supreme Court cases, and the shooting of Patrick Dorismond  by the Police Department in New York City .

 

Your report will include:

 

  1. - An analysis of “Mapp vs. Ohio” (1961) Date of incident (May 17, 1957)
  2. – A research on the facts of the killing of Patrick Dorismond
  3. – A survey of opinions on community and police relations in reference to race

relations (profiling).

 

 

PROCESS:

Students will work in groups. One group will be required to produce  the research as  follows:

 

1.      – A designated student will research and find out  the facts of “Mapp vs. Ohio.”

2.      -  The third student will collect data about the shooting of P.. Dorismond which

happened in the City of New York on March  16, 2000. A New York Grand

Jury declined to indict the police officer.The decision cleared Detective

Vazquez, who fired the fatal shot. All information must be gathered and

stored to be retrieved at any given moment

An issue question will be required as part of the completion of this part of the

Report. 

3.      - One person will conduct a survey opinions centered around how people feel about whether or not  if  Patrick. Dorismond rights were violated and  if race had  anything to do with what  happened. The survey will be done using

http://www.opinionpower.com/Surveys/83302507.html

 

 

RESOURCES

http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/scales/mapp.html

http://www.opinionpower.com/Surveys/83302507.html

http://www.nytimes.comm

http://www.nydailynews.com

http://www.nypost.com

http://www.anusha.com/dorismondny.com

TIPS Student Hanbook

Encyclopedia Brittanica

 

 

EVALUATION:

·        Grade A

 

1.-Research on facts of  “Mapp vs. Ohio” including handouts and issue question.

2.-Research on Patrick Dorismond case with issue question. Under what finding

facts was Det..Vazquez  cleared of wrong doing.

3.-Five (5)  question Opinion Power Survey using 4 different formats

4.-Two (2) ask a Legal Eagle questions relating to the P. Dorismond case

5.-One illustration  related to each of the cases (Total of three).

 

·        GradeB

 

1.-Research on facts of “Mapp vs. Ohio” including handouts and issue question

2.-Research on facts of Patrick Dorismond case with issue question. Under what

finding facts was Det. Vazquez cleared of wrongdoing

3.-Four (4) question opinion survey using 4 different formats (2 each).

4.-One (1) ask a Legal Eagle question related to the P. Dorismond case.

5.-One illustration related to P. Dorismond case.

 

 

·        Grade C

 

1.-Research on facts of  “Mapp vs. Ohio” including handouts and issue question.

2.-Research on facts of  Patrick Dorismond case with issue question. Under

what finding facts was Det. Vazquez cleared of wrongdoing.

3.-Three(3) question Opinion Power survey using 4 different formats.

 

·        Grade D

 

1.-Research on facts of “Mappvs. Ohio”including handouts and issue question.

2.-Research on facts facts of Patrick Dorismond case with issue question.

Under what finding  facts was Detc. Vazquez cleared of wrongdoing.

3.-One (1) question Opinion Powr saurvey using 4 different formats.

 

 

CONCLUSION:

You must  know  all the facts of the cases of “Mapp vs. Ohio”,  and the Patrick Dorismond  case. With a leap of common sense and equipped with some facts, you should be able to understand much better the question of race relations in this era around our nation and our cities. This  understanding can be of use in an attempt to clean completely this ugly stain that covers our great country.

 

STANDARDS:

 

New York State Social Studies Standard - S5 – Civics, Citizenship, and

Government – S1, S2, S3, S4.

English – E1d, E1c,E2a,E3b,E3c,E4b