Mr. Curran
United States History
A. Philip Randolph Campus High School
INTER ARMA SILENT LEGES*
*in times of war the laws fall silent
A Project SAVE Web Quest
Introduction:
While our Constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, was formed to protect our individual civil liberties against the abuses of an all-powerful central government, this has not always been the case. During times of conflict, the Federal government has curtailed or suspended our Constitutional rights to protect what they consider to be the “collective good” of the country. The above Latin phrase is used to describe such government action. Taken literally, it means that when a country is threatened during war, laws can be ignored in favor of more security. Needless to say, these actions never receive universal approval by the public and can cause greater instability than they try to prevent. Are there ever times in which the Federal government is justified in curtailing our liberties in favor of greater protection or are the Bill of Rights guaranteed to us even (or especially) during times of national emergency?
At
this very moment, the Federal government is debating this issue. Some in
Congress believe that the Federal wiretapping of telephone communications and
the imprisonment of suspected terrorists without trial violates the
Constitution. Others believes that
Task:
In this Web Quest you will be
asked to research one specific instance of the Federal government’s suspension
of our Civil Rights. After researching
your action, you will create a poster board in which you will either defend or
condemn the action taken by the Federal government. You will then present your findings and your
position to the class in the form of a presentation. The Poster
Board:
Should contain
both graphics and text
Should contain
all elements of the CompuLegal process as stated in the “process”.
Should be an
integral part of your oral presentation
Process:
The class will be divided into 6 groups. Each group will be given a specific Government action to either defend or condemn. The 6 groups are as follows:
Defend Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas
Corpus during the Civil War |
Condemn Lincoln’s suspension of Habeas
Corpus during the Civil War |
Defend the limits placed on Free Speech
during WWI |
Condemn the limits placed on Free Speech
during WWI |
Defend the internment of
Japanese-Americans during WWII |
Condemn the internment of
Japanese-Americans during WWII |
For the purposes of this project, your groups will research your positions by analyzing three landmark Supreme Court cases. These cases are:
Government Action |
Supreme Court Case |
|
|
Free Speech during WWI |
|
Internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII |
|
Resources:
Your group will analyze the Supreme Court Cases using the CompuLEGAL website. Using the website, each group will:
Study the FACTS and the Visual of the case
Complete “Facts & Issue Question” format
Complete Reasoning guide
Use “Precedents & the Constitution in your
Reasoning guide format
Clicking on your case above will take you to the website. Follow the instructions for each step outlined. All steps must be completed and all work handed into me for approval before you begin your poster boards. In addition to the CompuLEGAL website, you may use the following additional resources:
General Internet Search Engine (Google)
The Federal Supreme Court website
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute
Evaluation:
Topic |
Score of 4 |
Score of 3 |
Score of 2 |
Score of 1 |
Organization |
Extremely well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one
idea to another and cleverly conveyed; the organization enhanced the effectiveness of the project |
Presented in a thoughtful manner; there were signs
of organization and most transitions were easy to follow, but at times ideas
were unclear |
Somewhat organized; ideas were not presented
coherently and transitions were not always smooth. |
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult to
follow; transitions of ideas were abrupt. |
Content
Accuracy |
Completely accurate; all facts were precise and
explicit |
Mostly accurate; a few inconsistencies or errors in information |
Somewhat accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information |
Completely inaccurate; the facts in this project
were misleading |
Research
|
Went above and beyond to research information;
solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project |
Utilized materials provided to their full potential;
at times took the initiative to find information outside of school |
Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any additional resources |
Did not utilize resources effectively; did little or
no fact gathering on the topic |
Presentation/Creativity |
Was extremely clever and presented with originality; a unique approach that truly enhanced the project All members of the group
effectively participated |
Was clever at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented All members of the group
participated in some capacity |
Added a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate it throughout Some members did not participate during the
presentation |
Little creative energy used during this project; was
bland, predictable, and lacked “zip” Most members of the group did not
participate during the presentation |
Presentation Mechanics |
Was engaging, provocative, and captured the interest of the audience and maintained this throughout the entire presentation; great variety of visual aids; visual aids were colorful and clear |
Was well done and interesting to the audience; was presented in a unique manner and was
very well organized; some use of visual aids |
Was at times interesting and was presented clearly and precisely; was clever at times and was
organized in a logical manner; limited variety of visual aids and visual aids were not colorful or clear |
Was not organized effectively; was not easy to
follow and did not keep the audience interested; no use of visual aids |
NY State Standards
Addressed:
Social
Studies
Standard
1: History of the
Students
will use a variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of
major ideas, eras, themes, developments, and turning points in the history of
the
Standard 5: Civics,
Citizenship, and Government
Use a
variety of intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of the
necessity for establishing governments; the governmental system of the
English Language Arts
Standard 1: Language for Information and Understanding
Students will listen, speak,
read, and write for information and understanding. As listeners and readers,
students will collect data, facts, and ideas; discover relationships, concepts,
and generalizations; and use knowledge generated from oral, written, and
electronically produced texts. As speakers and writers, they will use oral and
written language that follows the accepted conventions of the English language
to acquire, interpret, apply, and transmit information.
Standard 2:
Language for Literary Response and Expression
Students will read and listen to
oral, written, and electronically produced texts and performances from American
and world literature; relate texts and performances to their own lives; and
develop an understanding of the diverse social, historical, and cultural
dimensions the texts and performances represent. As speakers and writers,
students will use oral and written language that follows the accepted
conventions of the English language for self-expression and artistic creation.
Standard 3:
Language for Critical Analysis and Evaluation
Students will listen, speak,
read, and write for critical analysis and evaluation. As listeners and readers,
students will analyze experiences, ideas, information, and issues presented by
others using a variety of established criteria. As speakers and writers, they
will use oral and written language that follows the accepted conventions of the
English language to present, from a variety of perspectives, their opinions and
judgments on experiences, ideas, information and issues.
Standard 4: Language
for Social Interaction
Students will listen, speak, read, and write for social interaction. Students will use oral and written language that follows the accepted conventions of the English language for effective social communication with a wide variety of people. As readers and listeners, they will use the social communications of others to enrich their understanding of people and their views.
Conclusion:
"It is neither desirable nor is it remotely likely
that civil liberty will occupy as favored a position in wartime as it does in
peacetime."
This quote from former Supreme Court Chief Justice
William Rehnquist was taken before the events of September 11TH and
the current Iraqi war. After 9/11, Our country is once again arguing whether or
not our liberties pose too great a risk to our security. Some are arguing that we must not allow our
enemies to use the freedoms we have as a sheild to protect them from
capture. Others argue that it is
precisely those freedoms that we are fighting to keep and that they should not
be taken away from us.
After completing this Web Quest, answer the following
questions:
How accurate
is Rehnquist’s quote?
Does history
validate or refute his statement ?
What faults
can you find in what he says?
Where do you
stand on this important issue facing our country?
Let’s hope this web quest made you aware of this critical issue. Moreover,
you should be keenly aware that democracy requires participation and debate.
Without it, democracy turns authoritarian.