Arthur Miller
Place
yourself in Salem, Massachusettes 1690.
You are living in a time when it is forbidden to be an
“individual.” You must dress and act
according to strict rules. Your daily
activities include tending to farm chores, studying the Bible, and
praying. You may not speak unless spoken
to and you cannot laugh aloud. The only
thing celebrated is “raising the roof” of a new farmhouse. You do not celebrate birthdays, or even
religious holidays.
You are a young adult living in Salem. You are to maintain a dairy for a month in
which you explore issues of the time, such as the witch trials, society’s
expectations, personal expectations, and your truthful feelings, fears, and
reactions to what is occurring. People
you know are being accused of being witches…Your whole life, you have relied on
Salem’s religious leaders…You are questioning Salem’s governing laws…
Image borrowed from
http://www.iath.virginia.edu/salem/generic.html
We will be reading the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller and
researching Salem of 1690. The themes of
separation of church and state, individual freedom and mass hysteria are
prominent. Innocent people were accused
of being in consort with the devil and, ironically, the only way to “prove”
their innocence was to “confess” that they were indeed witches but have found God and, thus, are redeemed. The political
and judicial leaders of the time thought that they were following God’s law to
rid Salem of the devil.
http://www.imagesjournal.com/issue02/reviews/crucible.htm#top
While we are reading The Crucible,
you will maintain a diary as if you were a citizen of Salem in 1690. You will also research this time period
intensively. Your diary must have a
minimum of 10 entries spanning a month.
In it, you must include historical facts, laws, and citizen reaction. The diary entries must include personal
commentary. At the end of the month,
your diary will be confiscated by the court in order to expose your
“individuality and free expression” which may or may not agree with Salem’s
expectations. You will be placed on
trial for your peers to determine whether you are working with the devil as a
witch. You will present your “diary” to
the class, which will serve as the jury.
Your diary
must define the social problem in Salem, gather evidence from the play and from
research, evaluate the existing public policy and make suggestions that would
remedy the injustice. Click on each
hyperlink to help you. Remember, you are
a citizen of Salem 1690, not a current citizen of Yonkers.
Click on the topic which will lead
you to the website.
Presentation Rubric www/ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
|
Evaluating Student
Presentations |
|
||
Developed by
Information Technology Evaluation Services, NC Department of Public
Instruction |
||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Organization |
Audience
cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience
has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. |
Student
presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. |
Student
presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can
follow. |
Subject
Knowledge |
Student
does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about
subject. |
Student
is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary
questions. |
Student
is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. |
Student
demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class
questions with explanations and elaboration. |
Graphics |
Student
uses superfluous graphics or no graphics |
Student
occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. |
Student's
graphics relate to text and presentation. |
Student's
graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. |
Mechanics |
Student's
presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
Eye
Contact |
Student
reads all of report with no eye contact. |
Student
occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. |
Student
maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student
maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. |
Elocution |
Student
mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in
the back of class to hear. |
Student's
voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have
difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student's
voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience
members can hear presentation. |
Student
uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all
audience members can hear presentation. |
Diary Rubric |
||||
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Thesis |
Student
makes a thesis and explains it. |
Student
makes a thesis but doesn't explain it. |
Student’s
thesis is buried, confused and/or unclear. |
Student
doesn't make a thesis. |
Reasons in support of the claim |
Student
gives clear and accurate reasons in support of thesis. |
Student
gives reasons in support of thesis but may overlook important reasons. |
Student
gives 1 or 2 weak reasons that don’t support thesis and/or irrelevant or
confusing reasons. |
Student
does not give convincing reasons in support of thesis. |
Organization |
Writing
has a compelling opening, an informative middle and a satisfying conclusion. |
Writing
has a beginning, middle and end. It marches along but doesn't dance. |
Writing
is organized but sometimes gets off topic. |
Writing
is aimless and disorganized. |
Voice and tone |
It
sounds like student cares about the issues and shows how he/she thinks and
feels about it. |
Tone
is OK but paper
could have been written by anyone. Student needs to tell more about how
he/she thinks and feels. |
Writing
is bland or pretentious. There is either no hint of a real person in it or it
sounds like a fake. |
Writing
is too formal or too informal. It sounds like student is distanced from the
topic. |
Word choice |
Words
used are striking but natural, varied and vivid. |
Routine
word choices. |
Words
used are often dull or uninspired or sound like student is trying too hard to
impress. |
The
same words are used over and over and over and over. Some words may be
confusing to a reader. |
Sentence fluency |
Sentences
are clear, complete, and of varying lengths. |
Well-constructed
sentences. |
Sentences
are sometimes awkward, and/or contain run-ons and fragments. |
Many
run-ons, fragments and awkward phrasings make essay hard to understand. |
Conventions |
Correct
use of grammar, spelling, and punctuation. |
Generally
used correct conventions with few errors |
Enough
errors to distract a reader. |
Numerous
errors make paper hard to understand. |
Adapted from:
http://www.pz.harvard.edu/Research/RubricsSelfPE.htm
This project will allow you and your classmates to experience the Salem
Witch Trials and all implications associated during the trials. You will have an opportunity to share the
information you learned and express your opinions with your classmates. After the mock trial, you will either be
exonerated with a clear name or be formally accused of being a “witch” and
finding yourself in need of a defense.
All students will formulate an opinion and policy that Salem should
follow and maintain for the benefit of its citizens.
Project Beginning Date:
Diary Due Date:
Presentation
Date: