Fast Food In a Fat City:
The Obesity Problem in NYC
Mr.
Frankel’s Webquest
George
Westinghouse HS
Introduction:
Eric Schlosser’s Fast Food Nation gives new meaning to
the old saying, “You are what you eat.” Since the dawn of the fast food
industry in the 1950’s patriotic Americans have been scarfing down Happy Meals,
Big Macs, Double Pounders with Cheese, Supersize Fries, and Big Gulp Pepsi
Colas. As a result, we’ve become a proud nation of toxic, lethargic,
overstuffed cows.
Fast food may be tasty,
it may be convenient, it may be cheap, but it isn’t healthy. The bottom line
for multinational fast food corporations like McDonalds is profit--their goal is to make money. There’s nothing wrong with
that, right? But what are the hidden costs of America’s love of fast food,
especially for teenagers in the Bronx?
You have been assigned
to a taskforce to raise public awareness at George Westinghouse High School
about the myriad health risks of a fast food diet. You will us your rhetorical
expertise and research skills not only to persuade target audiences of the
existence of this health crisis but to propose feasible and effective policies
to improve the overall health of young people in the Brooklyn.
Task:
Public Awareness
Campaign (PAC)—your team will produce a multimedia Public Awareness Campaign to
raise awareness at George Westinghouse HS and within the Brooklyn community of
the health risks of a fast food diet and propose and effective solutions to
alleviate the problem. Your PAC will include:
a poster, a one-page informational
leaflet, and a 10 page power point presentation.
Process:
1. You will be assigned to teams of four
or five; each teammate will be responsible for a fair share of the work and
will be graded equally for the quality of the
2. You will use the various steps of the
Public Policy Analyst worksheets to do the following:
i. Define
the Problem and Worksheet #1
ii. Gather Evidence and Worksheet #2
iii. Identify Causes and Worksheet#3
iv. Evaluate
Existing Public Policies and Worksheet #4
v. Develop
Your Own Solutions and Worksheet #5
vi. Choose
the Best Solution(s) and Worksheet #6
NOTE: Steps ii, iii, and iv of the PPA worksheets will
require extensive and varied research, and should not be limited to internet
research; steps v, and vi require original and collaborative thinking on the
part of all team members. Again, all team members are responsible for the
quality of the research and the responses for these worksheets—this is a
collaborative project!
3. You
will use the information from the PPA worksheets to produce the three
components of your PAC (poster, leaflet, and powerpoint);
in addition to the above descriptions, your PAC should do the following:
-address
a specific audience
-appeal to your audience’s, values, interests, and emotions
-establish a credible ethos appropriate to your subject and
audience
-support claims with logical arguments and convincing
evidence
-be thoroughly edited, proofread, and entirely free of
spelling errors
4. PACs will be assessed using the rubric
below.
5. Final PACs will be presented and
distributed to target audiences at George Westinghouse HS and/or at selected
sites throughout the Brooklyn Community.
Resources:
Some Search Engines
Some Websites
Evaluation
(see rubric)
|
Beginning 1 |
Developing 2 |
Accomplished 3 |
Exemplary 4 |
Score |
|
Ideas/organization (Logos) |
Extremely superficial knowledge or confused articulation of the
problem and related issues; extremely uneven, illogical sequence of ideas |
Superficial knowledge or confused articulation of the problem and
related issues; uneven logic and/or sequence of ideas |
Solid knowledge and detailed articulation of the problem and
related issues; intelligent, logical sequence of ideas |
In depth knowledge and clear articulation of the problem and
related issues; intelligent, logical,
and engaging sequence of ideas |
|
|
Research/evidence |
Poor research; evidence irrelevant and lacking in detail. Did nt use PPA |
Inadequate research; evidence may be irrelevant or lacking in
detail. Only minor reference to PPA |
Solid research from a variety of sources; relevant and detailed
evidence supporting claims using PPA |
Thorough and thoughtful research from a variety of sources;
relevant, detailed, and illuminating evidence supporting claims using PPA |
|
|
Ethos |
Fails to establish credible ethos; inappropriate to audience
and/or subject |
Establishes ethos but may be inconsistent or occasionally
inappropriate to audience and/or subject |
Establishes credible, trustworthy ethos appropriate to target
audience and subject |
Establishes compelling, credible, and trustworthy ethos
appropriate to target audience and subject |
|
|
Pathos |
Fails to appeal to specific audience’s emotions, values, and
concerns to achieve rhetorical purposes |
Insufficient or inconsistent appeals to audience’s emotions,
values, and concerns to achieve rhetorical purposes |
Appeals to specific audience’s emotions, values, and concerns to
achieve rhetorical purposes |
Successfully appeals to specific audience’s emotions, values, and
concerns to achieve desired rhetorical purposes |
|
|
Editing/Presentation |
MLA format seriously
inconsistent; immature and ineffective writing; lapses in conventions,
grammar, |
MLA format
inconsistent; lapses in conventions,
grammar, and spelling occasionally hinder under-standing |
MLA format; writing is
mature and effective; occasional lapses in conventions, grammar and spelling
do not hinder under-standing |
MLA format; writing is
mature, effective, and grammatical; mastery of conventions and free of
spelling errors |
|
|
Conclusion:
Upon completing this project you and your teammates will
have examined a national (and increasingly global) social problem and how it
affects young people right here in the Brooklyn. You will have exercised your
higher level thinking skills by exploring the causes of this problem and
developing feasible and effective solutions for the good of our community.
Moreover, you will have practiced your rhetorical skills by producing an
engaging and persuasive multimedia Public Awareness Campaign that will encourage
young people in the Brooklyn live healthier, if not happier, lives.
Common Core Standards
At the end of this assignment
students will have performed the following standards.
·
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.11-12.1 Cite
specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts,
attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies
in the account.
·
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.11-12.3 Follow
precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking
measurements, or performing technical tasks; analyze the specific results based
on explanations in the text.
·
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.11-12.7
Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse
formats and media (e.g., quantitative data, video, multimedia) in order to
address a question or solve a problem.
· CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RST.11-12.9 Synthesize information from a range of sources (e.g., texts, experiments, simulations) into a coherent understanding of a process, phenomenon, or concept, resolving conflicting information when possible.