Teaching Refugees
Patricia Kapps
pkapps@uticaschools.org
Process : PPA (Public Policy
Analyst), Internet Resources
English Language Learners at
Proctor High School make up nearly 17% of the population. The majority of those students are classified
as refugees.
In this web quest, you will have
the opportunity to become a Public Policy Analyst. Ultimately, you will be
responsible for implementing small changes that will increase social/emotional
well-being of refugee students at your school.
You’re a teacher who has been asked by your department chair to research
the problems faced by ELLs at
Sometimes it can be difficult
working with teachers, so you don’t want to overwhelm them. You want to create an academic environment
that fosters a love for learning and shared motivation to create change in
simple, everyday situations. Good luck and enjoy the opportunity!
You need to create a short presentation which explores the effect that
serving refugee populations has on graduation rates. You will ask your teacher to invite the
Principal and some staff members to a presentation of the finished
documentary. After the presentation you
can discuss your findings and make suggestions.
You will create an outline for a
brief oral presentation to your
colleagues in a PLC meeting in order to discuss suggestions. You will then present a sample presentation
for the class.
The problem has already been
defined for you. Use the Internet
Resources below to gather evidence about a specific group of
refugees. Sift through the information
to identify reasons why refugee students struggle. Also work with your partner to outline which
policies already exist in our school.
You will then share your information with your department. Afterwards, you will develop solutions
together and come up with one small step your department can take to meet the
needs of our students.
Public Policy Analyst
Here you will find links to the
PPA, which will assist you in each step of your task.
3.
Identify
causes: Look at the surveys and find trends and anomalies. Determine one cause of the conflict between
students and parents.
4.
Evaluate a
policy: What, if anything, are the state and federal governments
currently doing to address this notion of a “Culture of Disrespect?”
5.
Develop
solutions: Propose several public policies which may address
disrespect.
6.
Select best
solution: Explore the negative consequences of the proposed policies
to choose the one which will benefit your community the most, and create a
program to educate the public about the lack of respect.
INTERNET RESOURCES
Cultural
Groups
v
§ Somali History and Immigration to
the United States
§ Somali Bantu Cultural Profile
v
v
v
§ Iraqi Refugee Assistance Program (IRAC)
Refugee Resource Websites
v UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees)
v Office of Refugee Resettlement
v US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
Refugees in Schools
v Bridging Refugee Youth and Child
Services
v Children and Education in Refugee
Camps
v Utica Police Working with Refugees
The Evaluation
Evaluating Student Presentations |
|||||
Developed by Information Technology Evaluation Services,
NC Department of Public Instruction |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Total |
|
Organization |
Audience
cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information. |
Audience
has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. |
Student
presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. |
Student
presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can
follow. |
|
Subject Knowledge |
Student
does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about
subject. |
Student
is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary
questions. |
Student
is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate. |
Student
demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class
questions with explanations and elaboration. |
|
Graphics |
Student
uses superfluous graphics or no graphics |
Student
occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. |
Student's
graphics relate to text and presentation. |
Student's
graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. |
|
Mechanics |
Student's
presentation has four or more spelling errors and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors. |
Presentation
has no misspellings or grammatical errors. |
|
Eye Contact |
Student
reads all of report with no eye contact. |
Student
occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. |
Student
maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. |
Student
maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. |
|
Elocution |
Student
mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in
the back of class to hear. |
Student's
voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have
difficulty hearing presentation. |
Student's
voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience
members can hear presentation. |
Student
uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all
audience members can hear presentation. |
|
Total Points: |
Sometimes we are so focused on Common Core Shifts and the
APPR that we forget the human side of our jobs.
Hopefully this process will have refreshed you or touched you in some
way. We need to remember why we are
teachers! After completing this process
you should find yourself more knowledgeable about the circumstances that
surround your students. You now have the resources you need to be able to
integrate policies in your department to help you address the needs of your
students. We are all in this together.
Thank you for your participation.
State Standards
Below are the NYS Common Core
Standards that are met throughout your participation in this project.
Common Core Standards in Literacy - Speaking and Listening
SL.1.12
1. Initiate
and participate effectively in a range of collaborative discussions
(one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grades
11–12 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas
and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
a. Come to discussions prepared, having read and researched material under study;
explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence from texts and
other research on the topic or issue to stimulate a thoughtful, well-reasoned
exchange of ideas.
b. Work with peers to promote
civil, democratic discussions and decision-making, set clear goals and
deadlines, and establish individual roles as needed.
c. Propel conversations by
posing and responding to questions that probe reasoning and evidence; ensure a
hearing for a full range of positions on a topic or issue; clarify, verify, or
challenge ideas and conclusions; and promote divergent and creative
perspectives.
d. Respond thoughtfully to
diverse perspectives; synthesize comments, claims, and evidence made on all
sides of an issue; resolve contradictions when possible; and determine what
additional information or research is required to deepen the investigation or
complete the task.
e. Seek to understand other
perspectives and cultures and communicate effectively with audiences or
individuals from varied backgrounds.
Common
Core Standards in Technology – Math Science and Technology Standard 2
2. Beyond the use of reasoning and consensus,
scientific inquiry involves the testing of proposed explanations involving the
use of conventional techniques and procedures and usually requiring
considerable ingenuity.