Stereotypical Representation of the Poor in Media Messages Used by Nonprofit Organizations

 

 

 

Maria Fielteau

Thomas R. Proctor High School

mfielteau@uticaschools.org

 

 

 

 

The Introduction

Your class has been chosen to participate in a panel to study and to analyze the representation of poor in media messages used by nonprofits in the United States.

 

"Poverty: a human condition characterized by the sustained or chronic deprivation of the resources, capabilities, choices, security and power necessary for the enjoyment of an adequate standard of living and other civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights."

                                                ~United Nations’ definition of poverty

 

 

The Task.

Because poverty is a dynamic term, you will discuss and debate what we mean when we use the word and how we distinguish between different kinds of poverty—abject, absolute, relative, individual, communal, domestic, national, transnational—in the real world as well as in the worlds of our respective mages. You will analyze what these images seem to be saying about the kind of poverty that is being represented, and what the images imply about the production of and potential solutions for poverty. Who is poverty associated with?  What is it linked to? You will consider these questions as you complete our web-quest.

You will 

·         apply PPA to the problem of stereotypical representation of the poor in media messages used by nonprofit organizations

·         create a three page outline of the findings based on the article of Diana George “Changing the face of Poverty” and the review of current images used by nonprofits

·         produce two-page written recommendation for nonprofits based on the findings

 

 

The Process

Your teacher will divide the class into groups of 4 to review the images of poor used by the major nonprofits using “Notice and Focus” and report back to the whole class

Here are some questions you’ll want to consider as you view your images:

Ø  How does the image create a definition of “poverty”?

Ø  Who are the poor? 

Ø  Are the characters coded in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, etc. as well as class?

Ø  How do they reflect their real counterparts?

Ø  How are the complexities of those people being brought to light?  How are they being eroded, erased, or simplified?

Ø  What explanations does the image seem to offer for the conditions of the impoverished characters?  What does the image seem to be saying about the mechanisms at work behind this poverty? 

Ø  What does it imply about the potential solutions (or lack thereof) for global and local poverty? 

Ø  What is the image arguing about poverty, and what appeals does it employ?

 

The Steps of the Public Policy Analyst (PPA):

http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/tips/ppaqe.html

 

1.                                   Define the Problem

2.                                   Gather the Evidence

3.                                   Identify the Causes

4.                                   Evaluate an Existing Policy

5.                                   Develop Solutions

6.                                   Select the Best Solution

(Feasibility vs. Effectiveness)

 

 

·         Group 1 visits the website for the Salvation Army

http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn_2.nsf/vw-local/Home

 

 

 

·         Group 2 visits the website for the Rescue Mission

https://rescue-mission.org/food-services

 

https://rescue-mission.org/image/food_2.jpg

 

 

 

·        Group 3 visits the website for Habitat for Humanity

http://www.habitat.org/lc/quicktour/3_whoweserve.htm

 

http://www.habitat.org/lc/quicktour/img/img_whoweserve.jpg

 

·        Group 4 visits the website for Open Door Mission

http://www.opendoormission.org/

 

http://www.opendoormission.org/sites/default/files/1---Hungry-for-New-Life-2013.jpg?1356982468

 

 

Using the knowledge from above, do the worksheets at the bottom of PPA steps 1 and 2:

 

Define the Problem  

Gather the Evidence

 

Identify the Causes

Explore how the poor are represented throughout history in order to identify the causes of stereotypical portrayal.

Students are divided in 6 groups and jigsaw a part of the article “Changing the Face of Poverty” by Diana George.

o   Group 1 reads  and summarizes the representation of poor in the works of Grueze and Hogarth p. 238

o   Group 2 reads and summarizes the representation of poor in the works of Henry Mayhew p. 238

o   Group 3 reads  and summarizes the representation of poor in the works of Jack London p. 239

o   Group 4 reads  and summarizes the representation of poor in the works of Jacob Riis p. 239

o   Group 5 reads  and summarizes the representation of poor in the works of Helen Campbell p. 239-240

o   Group 6 reads  and summarizes the representation of poor in the photo project for the Farm Security Administration p. 241

Groups share information with the whole class.

 

Evaluate an Existing Policy

Students divided into two groups. Group 1 evaluates Jonh Engler’s back-to-work program, while group 2 evaluates democrats’ proposed amendments to Engler’s bill (p.248-249). Each group completes and later presents the following worksheet.

Worksheet 4:  Evaluating existing public policies

 

1.   State one of the major existing policies that attempts to deal with the social problem:

 

 

2.   What are the advantages of this policy (consider effectiveness, costs, enforcement, public acceptance):

 

 

3.   What are the disadvantages of this policy?  Consider effectiveness, costs, enforcement, public acceptance):

 

 

4.   Based on your evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages, should the current policy be totally replaced, strengthened, or improved?  What advantages, if any, from the current policy should be retained?  What disadvantages, if any, should be eliminated?

 

 

 

 

Develop Solutions

Students work in groups of four to complete and to present the following worksheet.

 

Worksheet 5:  Developing public policy solutions

 

Propose at least three new/original public policy alternatives.  Be sure that all of your public policy alternatives are at the same geopolitical level as your social problem.  Each alternative must specify the actual government or agency that will carry out the proposed action.

1.

 

 

 

2.

 

 

 

3.

 

 

 

 

Select the Best Solution (Feasibility vs. Effectiveness)

Students remain in the same groups of four to complete and to present the following worksheet.

 

 Worksheet 6:  Selecting the best public policy solution

1.  List the three public policy alternatives from Worksheet 5.  Create a short word or abbreviation to summarize each policy and write it at the end of each policy.

1.

 

 

2.

 

 

3.

 

 

 

2.       Use the format in the example to complete the matrix below:

 

 

EFFECTIVENESS

FEASIBILITY

 

HIGH

MEDIUM

LOW

HIGH

 

 

 

 

MEDIUM

 

 

 

 

LOW

 

 

 

 

3.       Discuss the reasons for your decisions in the matrix.

 

 

 

 

 

4.           Discuss why your group prefers one alternative over the other two.

 

 

 

 

 

The Resources are the websites students will use to complete the task. Also, other website links related to the topic may be included.

1.   http://fc.niskyschools.org/~tlester/S039185F0.11/18%20Changing%20the%20Face%20of%20Poverty.pdf

2.   http://www.habitat.org/lc/quicktour/0_welcome.htm

3.   https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=milwaukee+rescue+mission&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&docid=et4OJBJsh5zgCM&tbnid=buL3iX0k8gYXSM:&ved=0CAQQjB0&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmilmission.secure-donation.org%2F&ei=z05TUfryMeiB0QHAsoDwBg&bvm=bv.44342787,d.dmg&psig=AFQjCNF_NbgyhioTnFPQ6d85qrMYnGuwvw&ust=1364500556476450

4.     http://www.opendoormission.org/

5.     https://rescue-mission.org/food-services

6.   http://www.salvationarmyusa.org/usn/www_usn_2.nsf/vw-local/Home

7.   http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/tips/ppaqe.html

 

 

The Evaluation

The final project is completed individually by each student. Students are required to

·         create a three page outline of the findings based on the article of Diana George and the review of current images used by nonprofits

·         produce two-page written recommendation for nonprofits based on the findings

 

Rubric:

Organization: The writer organized the essay effectively, with explicit and thoughtful claims that precede discussions of the image and the text, and with logical transitions between sections.

[_____ out of 20 points]

Close work w/ the Texts: The writer worked closely and rhetorically with the chosen reading and image. In other words, the writer accurately identified each text’s main purpose and argument, quoted, paraphrased, and summarized where appropriate and necessary, and interpreted material and/or offered it up as evidence.

                                                                             [_____ out of 25 points]

Critical Thinking/Synthesis: The writer developed new ideas specific to the reading and image, and engaged readers in a more complicated, more thoughtful way of thinking about the reading, image, and related issues. In other words, the writer provided details, not generalizations, new ideas, not clichés, and analysis, not summary.

                                                                             [_____ out of 25 points]

Introduction & Conclusion: The writer composed rhetorically effective beginning and ending paragraphs.

                                                                             [_____ out of 15 points]

Grammar & Style: The writer edited for grammar, style, and usage effectively.

                                                                             [_____ out of 10 points]

Citation: The writer cited text[s] appropriately and properly using MLA citation procedure.

                                                                             [_____ out of 5 points]

 

 

The Conclusion

As we applied public policy analysis to the problem of stereotypical representation of the poor in media messages used by nonprofit organizations, we engaged closely with the article “Changing the Face of Poverty” by Diana George. We analyzed how the poor are represented in media images used by nonprofit organizations and made claims about what these images seem to be saying about the kind of poverty that is being represented, and what the images imply about the production of and potential solutions for poverty. We examined existing policies related to the consequences of the use of images of poor in the media and wrote recommendation for nonprofits based on the findings.

 

STANDARDS

New York State P-12 Common Core Learning Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy

  • Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.
  • Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse formats and media, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words
  • Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
  • Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
  • Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation
  • Prepare for and participate effectively in a range of conversations and collaborations with diverse partners, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly and persuasively.
  • Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience

Reading Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies 6–12

·         Determine the central ideas or information of a primary or secondary source; provide an accurate summary that makes clear the relationships among the key details and ideas.

 

·         Integrate information from diverse sources, both primary and secondary, into a coherent understanding of an idea or event, noting discrepancies among sources