Was George Orwell right?
Vicki Mannion
Introduction:
In the world George Orwell created
in his novel 1984, there was no
expectation of privacy. His characters
were watched at home, at work, in the street, even in their sleep. His world is dark, frightening, and oppressive. But how accurate a prediction was it? We surf the internet, text our friends, put
our pictures up on Facebook, Tweet our lives, and walk through security in
malls and airports without batting an eyelash.
Are we giving up too much privacy?
Do we even know how much, or how little privacy we really have? What can we do to control how much of
personal information is sent out into the world?
Task:
You and your classmates have been asked to
prepare a presentation for your classmates and a Public Service Announcement
(PSA) that can be shared with the student body. You will have 3 days in the
computer lab to work on this project.
All presentations are due on the date announced in class. Your group may
break the work up as you wish, although you will be graded on observed work
during class time. Here are the details:
1. You
will prepare and present to your classmates a Power
Point or Prezi presentation that:
a.
Defines
the problem of privacy in at least 1 area of your lives
b.
Explains
the causes of each aspect
c.
Evaluates
what is done now to control how much personal information is disseminated and
to whom
d.
Develops
and proposes 3 new potential solutions to the problem and then picks the best
one for implementation
2. You
will create a 60 second Public
Service Announcement (PSA)
that could be shared with CBA’s student body about your privacy problem. This must be created in a format that can be
shown in the classroom, and you must hand in a typed copy of the PSA
script.
3. You will create a properly formatted Works
Cited page that covers both the Power Point and
the PSA. You can use Easybib.com to
do this, just make sure you follow correct MLA style for citation of each
source. Go to the CBA
Library website for links
to MLA style information.
Process:
Use these steps to examine your
problem and prepare your presentation and PSA.
You are expected to complete and hand in one copy of the worksheets
available for each step. You’ll notice
that these are the required parts of your PowerPoint presentation.
·
Evaluate
the Existing Policy
Resources:
In addition to the Databases you can find on
the CBA
Library website, you may
find the following websites of help in your research:
For general information about privacy:
The American Civil Liberties Union has many links for information
on privacy rights, workers rights and more.
Try this one- www.privacyrights.org
Privacy Law
in the USA @ http://www.rbs2.com/privacy.htm
If you’re
looking specifically at Facebook: http://www.forbes.com/sites/chunkamui/2011/08/08/facebooks-privacy-issues-are-even-deeper-than-we-knew/
And this is
really scary, or is it?: http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/tech/social-media/facebook-find-friends-nearby/index.html?hpt=hp_bn5
If you’re
interested in government spying:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/2518
If you’re interested in news stories related to privacy: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/eveningnews/main509140.shtml
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2002/02/13/bookstores/?x
Evaluation:
Your group will
be evaluated on your PowerPoint and your PSA.
You will receive one 100 point grade for this project, with each part
counting for half of the grade.
PowerPoint Presentation |
CATEGORY
|
Excellent-4
|
Good-3
|
Satisfactory-2
|
Needs Improvement-1
|
Content - Accuracy
|
All content throughout the presentation is
accurate. There are no factual errors. |
Most of the content is accurate but there is one
piece of information that seems inaccurate. |
The content is generally accurate, but one piece
of information is clearly inaccurate. |
Content confusing or contains more than one
factual error. |
Sequencing of Information
|
Information is organized in a clear, logical way.
It is easy to anticipate the next slide. |
Most information is organized in a clear, logical
way. One slide or piece of information seems out of place. |
Some information is logically sequenced. An
occasional slide or piece of information seems out of place. |
There is no clear plan for the organization of
information. |
Effectiveness |
Project includes all material needed to give a
good understanding of the topic. The project is consistent with the driving
question. |
Project is lacking one or two key elements.
Project is consistent with driving question most of the time. |
Project is missing more than two key elements. It
is rarely consistent with the driving question. |
Project is lacking several key elements and has
inaccuracies. .Project is completely inconsistent with driving question. |
Use of Graphics |
All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and
support the topic of the presentation. |
A few graphics are not attractive but all support
the topic of the presentation. |
All graphics are attractive but a few do not
support the topic of the presentation. |
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract
from the content of the presentation. |
Text - Font Choice & Formatting
|
Font formats (color, bold, italic) have been
carefully planned to enhance readability and content. |
Font formats have been carefully planned to
enhance readability. |
Font formatting has been carefully planned to
complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. |
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read
the material. |
Spelling and Grammar
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical
errors. |
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no
grammatical errors. |
Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no
misspellings. |
Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or
spelling errors. |
Cooperation |
Group shares tasks and all performed responsibly
all of the time. |
Group shares tasks and performed responsibly most
of the time. |
Group shares tasks and performs responsibly some
of the time. |
Group often is not effective in sharing tasks
and/or sharing responsibility. |
Delivery |
Members spoke at a good rate, volume and with
good grammar. They maintained eye-contact while using, but not reading
their notes. |
Members spoke a little faster or slower than
necessary, or too quietly or loudly. They used acceptable
grammar. They maintained eye-contact, but relied too much on their
notes. |
Members spoke at a good rate and volume, but used
poor grammar. They relied heavily on
their notes. |
Members demonstrated having paid little attention
to rate, volume or grammar. They read nearly word for word from notes. |
||
|
|
|
||||
CATEGORY |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Content |
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject
knowledge is excellent. |
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject
knowledge appears to be good. |
Includes essential information about the topic but there
are 1-2 factual errors. |
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. |
Delivery |
Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that
holds audience attention. |
Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth
delivery that usually holds audience attention. |
Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention
most of the time. |
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. |
Originality |
Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas
are creative and inventive. |
Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas
and insights. |
Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there
is little evidence of original thinking. |
Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. |
Time length |
55-65 seconds long; pre-produced |
55-65 seconds; performed in class |
30-55 seconds; performed in class or pre-produced. |
Under 30 seconds; performed in class |
Standards:
This
webquest fulfills NYS Standards in:
ELA Core Grades 9-12,
Standard 1: Students will read, write, listen, and speak
for information and understanding
ELA Core Grades 9-12,
Standard 3: Students will read, write, listen, and speak
for critical analysis and evaluation
Science, Math, and
Technology Standard 2: Information
technology is used to retrieve, process, and communicate information and as a
tool to enhance learning
Conclusion:
Your
research has shown you that perhaps George Orwell was right to be afraid. We may not live in the world he created, but
we do run the risk of giving up too much of our privacy as technology advances
in the 21st century.