“All men are
created equal” or are they?
Mr. Michael Downes,
Ditmas I.S. 62 Brooklyn
(towdownes@yahoo.com)
Introduction:
“All men are
created equal” or are they? After the Civil War, Jim Crow laws were spreading
throughout the South. These laws
enforced segregation or separation of the races. “Separate but equal” became
the law of the land in 1896 with the landmark case Plessy
v. Ferguson. The fight for equality became a major issue in the 1950’s. You
have been chosen to create a PowerPoint exploring how the social problem of the
lack of equal educational opportunity for blacks led to the U.S. Supreme Court
developing a new policy to correct this social problem. This policy was
articulated by the landmark decision in Brown
v. Board of Education. This public policy redefined the terms “equality”
and “separation.” Its ramifications are
still in headline play today in terms of life changing education opportunity.
Task:
You will
create a PowerPoint that uses the American
History Public Policy Analyst (AHPPA) to analyze the Court’s decision in Brown, with the focus on issue of school
segregation. In your PowerPoint, you will compare and contrast the landmark
cases Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education to explain how the Brown case changed American society. You must include at least 5 pictures
in your slides.
Process/Resources
In your PowerPoint,
you must have 10 slides that do the following:
(Slide 1) title page All Men are Created Equal or are they? (1 picture) (Use all the hyperlinks as your resources.) (You may also use the hyperlinks to find five appropriate pictures for your PowerPoint.)
(Slide 2) (1
picture) Define the problem resource 1
(Use the hyperlinks for other resources that help Define the problem.)
http://ookaboo.com/o/pictures/topic/12379793/Plessy_v_Ferguson
Step 1:
Define the problem: Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that” separate but equal” = equal. African
Americans were supposedly entitled to separate but equal educational facilities
and instruction. In reality, the
physical and material resources of their “separate education” facilities were
inferior to the physical and material resources of the educational facilities
available to white citizens. http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/ppa/usppaip1.html
(Slides 3, 4 and 5) (2pictures)
Step 2:
Gather Evidence: Gather
evidence resource 1 This step requires your group to use the
Internet to locate at least three different sources of evidence to support the
scope of your problem (“Separate but Equal”) The goal of these activities is to
develop problem solving/argument writing and speaking skills
through using the Internet to gather evidence about your problem.
(Use
the hyperlinks for other resources which help Gather Evidence.)
http://americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/separate-but-equal.html
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5485/
http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/ppa/worksheet2us.doc
(Slides 6, 7 and 8) (1 picture)
Step 3: Identify Cause: If policy makers can identify
the causes or factors that contribute to a social problem (“Separate but
Equal”), then they can try to develop public policies to eliminate or lessen
those causes or factors. In these
slides, students will identify the causes that led to the enactment of the law
“Separate but Equal”
(Use the
hyperlinks for resources that help Identify Cause.)
http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/9401317541/sad-story-how-separate-but-equal-was-born
http://teachingamericanhistorymd.net/000001/000000/000085/html/t85.html
http://www2.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/ppa/worksheet3us.doc
(Slides
9 and 10) (1picture)
Step 4: Evaluate a Policy: Now, you are ready to begin to analyze the major public policy that was
enacted to address your social problem. Students will analyze the Brown v. Board of
Education case. They will explore the extent to which it addressed and
alleviated the problem of “Separate but Equal”.
(Use
the hyperlinks for resources that help Evaluate a Policy.)
http://web.ku.edu/~ojclass/brown/
http://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/evans/his135/Events/Brown54/Brown54.html
Evaluation
|
Beginning |
Developing |
Accomplished |
Exemplary |
Score |
Content |
Minimal single data accurate information is provided from court
cases. |
Information includes two accurate and comprehensive Steps, but
some are lacking sources. |
Information is 80% accurate and comprehensive. |
Information is completely accurate, comprehensive, and carefully
selected to meet the needs of the project, and incorporated Information from
given cases. |
|
Organization |
Materials poorly organized with, lack clarity, and logical
analysis of decision. |
Less than half the materials and steps demonstrate organization,
clarity and logical case analysis. |
80% materials and information demonstrate organization, clarity,
and logic of the cases |
All materials and information are well organized, clear and
logically analyze the cases. |
|
Visual Display for PowerPoint |
No use of graphic compelling images, paintings and photographs
which vivify the issue. |
Little use of color, pictures and other visuals that is
motivating to students. |
Some use of color, pictures and other visuals that are motivating
to students. |
Attractive display, using color, pictures and other visuals that
are motivating to students. |
|
Punctuality |
Presentation is turned in more than three days late. |
Presentation is turned in two days late. |
Presentation is turned in
one day late. |
Presentation is turned in by the deadline. |
|
Conclusion:
This web
quest helped set off students on an historical, sociological and education
center policy issue, which ironically is still very much in headlines and
frames ongoing school separation of sexes and classes. Students explored as investigators and as
stakeholders, the historic time period specific causes, factors and impact of
the decision but also learned how to do a step by step analysis of the issue
using multimedia graphics and commentary.
Ultimately as they evaluated the decision, they become aware through the
sources of how the decision is not a finite one grounded almost 60 years ago in
the 20th century, but is an issue that lingers in terms of separate
but equal education/recreation access by sex or economic class or access to
parental support/advocacy.
Standards:
This web
quest addresses the following standards in Literacy in History/SS
Reading for
literacy
Key Ideas
and Details
Cite
specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources
Determine
central ideas or information of primary and secondary sources-provide an
accurate summary of those sources
Identify key
steps in a text’s description of a process
Craft and
structure
Determine
the meaning of words and phrases as they are used in a text
Integration
of knowledge and ideas
Integrate
visual information
Distinguish
among fact, opinion and reasoned judgment
Analyze the
relationship between a primary and a secondary source on the same topic
Writing
Standards for Literacy in History /Social Studies
Text Types
and Purposes
Write arguments
on discipline specific content
Write
informative /explanatory texts
Use precise
language and domain specific vocabulary
Establish
and maintain a formal style and objective tone.
Provide a
concluding section
Production
and distribution of writing
Produce
clear and coherent writing in which development, organization and style are
appropriate to the task, purpose and audience.
Use
technology to produce and publish writing.
Research to build
and present knowledge
Conduct
short research projects
Gather
relevant material from multiple print and digital sources
Draw
evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection and research.