Name:
Michele Luard
School: Paul Robeson High School
Brooklyn New York
Could you imagine waking up in the U.S.A the land hailed
as having everything and you along with millions of Americans are starving!
Could you imagine in the next ten years starvation? Now that’s not all. Do you
suffer with Asthma? Well with all the developments you may? What’s the cost-
Global warming. The Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released nearly
unanimous findings. Their view is that the climate will continue to
change once humans continue to generate greenhouse gases. This climate change
will affect national security by affecting everything from economic growth to
social stability.
Using the Public Policy Analyst (PPA) you will examine the effects of global
climate change on agriculture and health of the United States of America, and
you will develop new policies to address these problems. You are all aware that
we have days during winter that feel like summer and days during summer that
feel like spring. However, do you ever consider the effect this has on food
available to you at dinner, or the reason why these changes occur, or the
effect that this has on farm homes. What can you do to change this? What is the
cause of this?
Working in your
identified group
Step 4 Evaluate an
existing Policy
Step 6 Select the
Best Solution
·
Create a Power
Point Presentation (if you do not know how to create a power point click on
the previous link). This presentation must have 12 – 16 slides that include the
steps of PPA.
·
Create a video (if you do not know how
to create a video click on the previous link). This video presentation must
have 18-10 minutes the video must include the steps PPA.
·
:
Power Point Presentation Rubric
Rubric for Peer Evaluation (5 points possible)
Each of your classmates not presenting
on the day you are will evaluate your power point presentation using the
Scoring Rubric below. Your final points for this portion of your evaluation
will be the average rating from everyone who hears your power point presentation
divided by 3.
Performance Criteria |
3Points |
2Point |
1 points |
Preparation |
Presentation was "almost
ready to go". We had to wait for this student to copy the presentation
on to the desktop. |
The student ran the
presentation off her/his disk |
The student did not have the
presentation completely ready and was finalizing some things as class began
and/or while other students were presenting. |
Organization |
Information was presented in a
logical, interesting sequence but some was easy to follow |
Information was somewhat
difficult to follow because student tended to "jump around" from
topic to topic |
There did not appear to be any
sequence nor order to the information presented. |
Technical Specifications |
|
Show contained between 5-10
slides |
Show contained <5 or >10
slides |
|
Show contained an original
graphic that was created by the student |
No original graphic was
included. |
|
Every slide contained a slide
transition |
Slide transitions were not
used for 1-2 slides |
Slide transitions were not
used for more than 2 slides |
|
Mechanics |
Demonstrated an outstanding
effort presenting the information through creative use of graphics and text |
Showed good effort in the
presentation, however graphics and text reflect only an "average"
effort |
Showed little effort in the
presentation. Graphics and text appear to be "thrown together at the
last minute" |
Use of technology |
|
Did not apologize
before, during or after the presentation for "not being very good
with computers" or "not being very interesting" |
Apologized before, during or
after the presentation for "not being very good with computers"
or "not being very interesting" |
Overall Presentation |
A good presentation. The
presenter demonstrated the ability to utilize the various features of the
program, however, the presentation did not always keep my interest |
The presenter did not seem
comfortable with the program and needed a lot of outside assistance in
getting through the presentation. |
The presenter displayed little
knowledge and understanding of the components of assignment, software,
computers, etc. |
Rubric for Instructor Evaluation (15 points possible)
I will be evaluating your
presentation using the Scoring Rubric below. Your final score will be the total
points earned below divided by 1.8.
Performance Criteria |
3Points |
2 Point |
1 Points |
Preparation |
Presented work on the day you
signed up for |
Requested an extension and
presented on a different day |
Was not prepared to present,
did not request an extension and had to present on a different day |
A copy of your
"Notes" was printed and given to the instructor prior to your
presentation |
The "Notes" were
printed after the presentation. |
"Notes" were not
available the day of the presentation. |
|
Needed assistance in copying
presentation to the main computer |
Copied presentation to the
desktop after presentations had begun |
Did not run presentation off
the desktop |
|
Organization |
Information was presented in a
logical, interesting sequence that was easy to follow |
Information was somewhat
difficult to follow because student tended to "jump around" from
topic to topic |
There did not appear to be any
sequence nor order to the information presented. |
Technical Specifications |
|
Show contained a digital photo
of yourself |
No digital photo was included |
All but one slide contained a
graphic |
2 slides did not contain
graphics |
More than 2 slides did not contain
a graphic |
|
Used some slide animations,
however, more were needed |
Overused slide animations to
the point that they were distracting |
No slide animations were used
during the presentation |
|
Mechanics |
Presentation had no
misspellings or grammatical errors |
Presentation contained 1-2
spelling or grammatical errors |
Presentation contained 3 or
more spelling or grammatical errors |
Presentation contained an
introduction, body and conclusion |
Presentation contained at
least 2 of the following: introduction, body & conclusion |
Presentation contained only 1
of the following: introduction, body & conclusion |
|
Use of technology |
Demonstrated some
understanding of how the technology is used for this project. |
Showed little understanding of
how the technology is used for this project |
Showed no understanding of how
the technology is used for this project |
|
Displayed proper respect and
appropriate behavior when using the computer |
Displayed inappropriate
behavior when using the computer. |
|
Overall Presentation |
A good presentation. The
presenter demonstrated the ability to utilize the various features of the
program, however, the presentation did not always keep my interest |
The presenter did not seem
comfortable with the program and/or needed a lot of outside assistance in getting
through the presentation. |
The presenter displayed little
knowledge and/or understanding of the components of assignment, software,
computers, etc. |