Brian Hyland
AP European History
Seton Catholic Central HS
Scene
from “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” http://www.intriguing.com/mp/holygrail.asp
“Bring out
your dead!” An
investigation into two plagues in history.
Introduction:
In
the year 429 BC,
Nearly 1800 years later, in AD 1348, as
the Renaissance was beginning, another plague swept
Your Task:
Each student will write a three-page
typed, double-spaced essay analyzing the striking similarities in the two
accounts. In this essay, each student will
compare and contrast the two accounts of plagues, and try to offer plausible
explanations for the similarities in them.
The student must take into account the original purposes of the two
works of literature.
The
Process:
First,
each student will read the assigned sections from Thucydides and Boccaccio, taking notes on what each author says about the
course of the plague in each city.
Next, by using the Public Policy Analyst’s Comparative
Analysis page, each student will summarize the ways in which each plague’s
effect on the population was similar.
Complete and print out the worksheet located on the page. Each student will title the worksheet, “The
Plague in
Using the information from the worksheet, each student
will then write the three-page essay to summarize the findings. This summary should include the similarities
in the lethal nature of each plague, their effects on society, their impact on
religion and how each city sought to explain the plague. Each student will then discuss any
significant differences in the two plagues.
Finally, each student must attempt to explain why the two descriptions
are so similar.
Resources:
Texts:
Thucydides,
History of the Peloponnesian War,
2.47-55
http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/GreekScience/Thuc.+2.47-55.html Thucydides’ account in
English.
Giovanni Boccaccio, The Decameron, Introduction, (002-048)
http://www.stg.brown.edu/projects/decameron/engDecShowText.php?myID=d01intro&expand=day01
The text of the
introduction in English, hyperlinked to the Italian.
Public Policy Analyst:
Use the
Public Policy Analyst comparative analysis page to help develop your
understanding of the similarities between the two plagues.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/plegal/PPA/ghppacomp.html
How You
Will Be Evaluated:
CATEGORY |
4 - Above Standards |
3 - Meets Standards |
2 - Approaching Standards |
1 - Below Standards |
Score |
Focus or Thesis
Statement |
The
thesis statement names the topic of the essay and outlines the main points to
be discussed. |
The
thesis statement names the topic of the essay. |
The thesis
statement outlines some or all of the main points to be discussed but does
not name the topic. |
The
thesis statement does not name the topic AND does not preview what will be
discussed. |
|
Evidence and Examples |
All of
the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given
that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's position. |
Most
of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are
given that show how each piece of evidence supports the author's position. |
At
least one of the pieces of evidence and examples is relevant and has an
explanation that shows how that piece of evidence supports the author's
position. |
Evidence
and examples are NOT relevant AND/OR are not explained. |
|
Accuracy |
All
supportive facts and statistics are reported accurately. |
Almost
all supportive facts and statistics are reported accurately. |
Most
supportive facts and statistics are reported accurately. |
Most supportive
facts and statistics were inaccurately reported. |
|
Sequencing |
Arguments
and support are provided in a logical order that makes it easy and
interesting to follow the author's train of thought. |
Arguments
and support are provided in a fairly logical order that makes it reasonably
easy to follow the author's train of thought. |
A few
of the support details or arguments are not in an expected or logical order,
distracting the reader and making the essay seem a little confusing. |
Many
of the support details or arguments are not in an expected or logical order, distracting the reader and making the essay seem
very confusing. |
|
Closing paragraph |
The
conclusion is strong and leaves the reader solidly understanding the writer's
position. Effective restatement of the position statement begins the closing
paragraph. |
The
conclusion is recognizable. The author's position is restated within the
first two sentences of the closing paragraph. |
The
author's position is restated within the closing paragraph, but not near the
beginning. |
There is no conclusion - the paper just ends. |
|
Sources |
All
sources used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and cited
correctly. |
All sources
used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and most are cited
correctly. |
Most
sources used for quotes, statistics and facts are credible and cited
correctly. |
Many
sources are suspect (not credible) AND/OR are not cited correctly. |
|
Sentence Structure |
All
sentences are well-constructed with varied structure. |
Most
sentences are well-constructed and there is some varied sentence structure in
the essay. |
Most
sentences are well constructed, but there is no variation is structure. |
Most
sentences are not well-constructed or varied. |
|
Grammar & Spelling |
Author
makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract
the reader from the content. |
Author
makes 1-2 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content. |
Author
makes 3-4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the
content. |
Author
makes more than 4 errors in grammar or spelling that distract
the reader from the content. |
|
PPA Worksheet |
Student
has completely filled in the worksheet with detailed, accurate data from Boccaccio. |
Student
has completely filled in the worksheet with accurate data from Boccaccio. Student
may have made onissions. |
Student
has completely filled in the worksheet, but much of the data is inaccurate. |
Student
has not completely filled in the worksheet. |
|
NY State
Standards:
Social
Studies Standard 2 - World History
Students will: use a variety of
intellectual skills to demonstrate their understanding of major ideas, eras,
themes, developments, and turning points in world history and examine the broad
sweep of history from a variety of perspectives
English
Language Arts Standard 1 – Language for Information and Understanding
Students will read, write, listen, and
speak for information and understanding. As listeners and readers,
students will collect data, facts, and ideas,
discover relationships, concepts, and generalizations; and use knowledge
generated from oral, written, and electronically produced texts. As speakers
and writers, they will use oral and written language to acquire, interpret,
apply, and transmit information
English
Language Arts Standard 3 – Language for Critical Analysis and Evaluation
Students will read, write, listen, and
speak for critical analysis and evaluation.
As listeners and readers, students will analyze experiences, ideas, information, and issues
presented by others using a variety of established criteria. As speakers and
writers, they will present, in oral and written language and from a variety of
perspectives, their opinions and judgments on experiences, ideas, information
and issues.
Math,
Science and Technology Standard 2 – Information Systems
Students will access,
generate, process, and transfer information using appropriate technologies.
Conclusion:
After reading the passages and analyzing
the similarities between the two plagues, students will come to see how two
different societies reacted in the face of similar disasters. While these insights may give the students
clues to human nature, they will also serve as an introduction to Renaissance
thought.