Racism in
Brian
Hyland
Introduction:
The
Civil War brought an end to slavery. The
Emancipation Proclamation, the 13th , 14th and 15th
Amendments had freed the slaves, granted them citizenship and basic civil
rights, but the reality of freedom was far different than what the former
slaves had expected. The Reconstruction
amendments were ignored throughout the country.
A century after the Civil War, the Civil Rights Movement tried to
enforce the original intent of these amendments.
In this project you will be historians
looking at the problem of racism in
Your Task:
The class will be randomly divided into six
groups as follows: North—men; North—women; Upper South—men; Upper South—women;
Deep South—men;
Ø
Each
group will first gather evidence on how the Reconstruction amendments were
ignored in different regions of the country, and how this affected
African-American men or women in each region.
Ø
Each
group will then use this to explain the motivations for the Civil Rights
Movement.
Ø
Each
group will produce a PowerPoint to present their findings on the experiences of
different groups of African-Americans in the century following the Civil
War.
The Process:
Each group should begin by identifying
a major problem confronting African-Americans in the century after the Civil
War. Use the worksheets at the American
History Public Policy Analysis site to guide your group through the steps. Use the hyperlinks below to take you to the
AHPPA sites; use your browser’s back arrow to return to this page. All worksheets are to be printed out, filled
out with the group’s members’ names, and handed in for a grade.
Ø
Step 1:
First, each group will be expected to identify the problem. Read the site and visit the links. Each group will fill out Worksheet #1 which
can be found here.
Ø
Step 2:
Next, each group will gather evidence, using the resources listed below. Students should also visit the AHPPA site to
study what gathering
evidence entails. Each group will
fill out Worksheet #2 which can be found here. Each group will be expected to find at least
three pieces of evidence in addition to what has been provided in the resources
below. Evaluate your evidence—who produced it, why was it produced, what does it say or
show?
Ø
Step 3:
Now, each group will determine the causes of this problem. First, visit the AHPPA site here and read
the description. Each group will fill
out Worksheet #3, which can be found here. Each group should be sure to give the
supporting evidence for every underlying cause; more than one piece of evidence
can be used for each cause.
Ø
Step 4:
Then, each group will evaluate a policy that was implemented to deal with the
problem. Policies may have arisen from
government (federal, state or local) or organizations (e.g., NAACP, SCLC, SNCC). To evaluate
the policy, read the material in the AHPPA site here and fill
out Worksheet #4, which can be found here. In your analysis, each group will read the
material on Benefits and Costs at the AHPPA site and follow the links. Fill out Worksheets #5 and #6.
Ø
Step 5:
Using the data gathered in steps 1 through 4, each group will produce a
PowerPoint showing how the lack of compliance with the Reconstruction
amendments led to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s.
Resources:
(students
may also use their own resources)
Reconstruction Amendments:
http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/amend1.htm
Plessy
vs.
Overview: http://campus.northpark.edu/history/WebChron/USA/PlessyFerguson.CP.html
Decision of the court:
http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/33.htm
Analysis of the decision:
http://www.landmarkcases.org/plessy/home.html
Jim Crow Laws:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories.html
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/jimcrow/
http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/remembering/laws.html
http://www.nps.gov/malu/documents/jim_crow_laws.htm
http://www.ferris.edu/news/jimcrow/
http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/aap/aapmob.html
(contains several pamphlets, photos, etc. from the 1890s)
http://www.africanamericans.com/IdaBellWells-Barnett.htm
Northern segregation:
http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_077900_segregation.htm
(Overview of segregation, north and south)
http://college.hmco.com/history/readerscomp/rcah/html/ah_010200_blackghettos.htm
http://teacher.scholastic.com/researchtools/articlearchives/honormlk/segraga.htm
http://www.oycf.org/Perspectives/4_022900/black_white.htm
http://encarta.msn.com/text_761580651__1/Segregation_in_the_United_States.html
http://www.uic.edu/orgs/kbc/ganghistory/Industrial%20Era/Riotbegins.html
http://chicago.urban-history.org/scrapbks/raceriot/raceriot.htm
(contains links to newspaper accounts of the riots of 1919)
http://www.chipublib.org/004chicago/disasters/riots_race.html
http://condor.depaul.edu/~chicago/primary_sources/negro.html
(selected survey results from the 1922 commission on race in
http://chicago.urban-history.org/scrapbks/raceriot/rr_txt02.htm
(report of the
http://ah.bfn.org/h/af/#overview
(history of African-Americans in
Movements to end racism:
http://www.africanamericans.com/WEBDuBois.htm
http://www.africanamericans.com/NiagaraMovement.htm
http://www.africanamericans.com/HarlemRenaissance.htm
http://www.africanamericans.com/MilitaryIntegrationChronology.htm
How You Will Be Evaluated:
Each worksheet will be evaluated on a 6 point scale, for a total
of 36 points, using the following rubric:
|
3 pts |
2 pts |
1 pt |
0 pts |
|
Content |
Content is
clear, concise, well-written. Answers
all questions thor-oughly with a logical
progression and supporting evidence. |
Content may
contain mistakes in grammar or syntax.
Answers all questions, but without a logical progression of ideas or
with little suppor-ting evidence. |
Content is
vague, poorly written. Does not answer
all the questions, or answers may be irrelevant. No supporting evidence. |
Worksheet not
done or not handed in. Worksheet
handed in, but is illegible or, contains poorly written work that does not
address the task. |
|
Research |
Worksheet
shows that the group accurately researched the problem, using a variety of
resources, and carefully con-sidered the data. |
Worksheet
shows that the group did some research on the problem, using some of the
resources, and drew conclusions based on the data. |
Worksheet
shows that the group did only superficial research on the problem, using only
one source. Conclusions may not be
based on the source at all. |
Worksheet not
done or not handed in. Worksheet
handed in, but shows no research done on the problem. No sources used. No conclusions drawn. |
|
The final PowerPoint will be evaluated
on an 8 point scale, for a total of 64 points, using the following rubric:
|
8 pts |
6 pts |
4 pts |
2 pts |
0 pts |
Introduc-tion |
The
introduction clearly presents the topic and indicates which region and
gender is being discussed. It gives an
overview of the whole presenta-tion. |
The
introduction clearly presents the topic and indicates which region and
gender is being discussed, but lacks
an overview of the whole presenta-tion. |
The
introduction generally presents the topic and may indicate which region
and gender is being discussed. Lacks
an overview of the whole presenta-tion. |
The
introduction is poorly structured and may not indicate which region and
gender is being discussed. Lacks an
overview of the whole presenta-tion. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or lacks an intro-duction. |
Content |
The content is
always written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information. Information is
accurate, and comes from a variety of sources. |
The content is
mostly written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information. Information is
accurate, and comes from a variety of sources. |
The content may contain some
minor errors in grammar. Progression of
ideas may include some di-gressions. Information is
generally accurate, but comes from only two or three sources. |
The content may contain some
minor errors in grammar. Progression of
ideas may include some di-gressions. Information is
generally accurate, but comes from only two or three sources. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or the content contains numerous
errors in grammar. No logical
progression of ideas. Information may be inaccurate, or comes from only one
source. |
Text elements |
The fonts are
easy-to-read and size varies properly for headings and text. Italics, bold
and indents used in a way to enhance the text. Text is concise and meaningful. Background and colors enhance the readability of text. |
The fonts are
usually easy-to-read and size varies properly for headings and text. In some
places, italics, bold, indents, color or background do not enhance the
text. Text is mostly concise and meaningful. |
The fonts are
hard-to-read or the size does not vary properly for headings and text. In some
places, italics, bold, indents, color or background begin to obscure the
text. Text may be too wordy or not
meaningful. |
Overall
readability is difficult with lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts,
dark or busy background, overuse of bold or lack of appropriate indentations
of text. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or the
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text in
small fonts, contrasting colors that
clash, poor use of headings, indents, or bold formatting. |
Layout |
The layout is
visually pleasing, enhancing the overall message with proper use
of headings, subheadings and white space. |
The layout is
generally pleasing, but one or more
slides may appear cluttered. |
Several slides
appear cluttered or distracting with large gaps of white space. |
Most slides
appear cluttered or distracting with large gaps of white space. Little attention paid to the visual pre-sentation. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or almost all slides appear poorly laid out. No attention paid to the visual pre-sentation. |
Graphics / sounds
/ anima-tions |
The graphics,
sounds and/or animations assist in presenting an overall theme enhancing the
concept. Images are
proper size and resolu-tion, to enhance the
content. There is a consistent visual theme. |
The graphics,
sounds and/or animations assist the audience in understan-ding
the flow of information or content. Images are proper size, resolution. |
A few of the
graphics, sounds, and/or animations unrelated to the topic and do not enhance the
concept. A few of the
images are too large or too small, and may be poorly
cropped or have poor resolution. |
Most of the
graphics, sounds, and/or animations unrelated to the topic and do not enhance the
concept. Most of the
images are too large or too small, and may be poorly
cropped or have poor resolution. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or no graphics,
sounds, and/or animations used.
If any are used they are totally unrelated to the topic or distract
from the topic. |
Citations |
Sources of information always
cited properly, allowing the audience
to determine accuracy and authority of
information presented. |
Sources of
information usually cited properly, allowing the audience to determine accuracy and
authority of information presented. |
Some citations
given, but no consis-tant use of citations, leading
the audience to question the accuracy and authority of information presented. |
Few citations
given. Audience has no way to assess
the accuracy and authority of information presented. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or no citations used. |
Team-work |
Using the
notes function of PowerPoint, the team consistently indicates which team
member produced which information on each slide. Notes indicate that all team members
contributed equally
to the final project. |
Using the
notes function of PowerPoint, the team usually indicates which team member
produced which information on each slide.
Notes indicate that all team members usually contributed to the final
project. |
Using the
notes function of PowerPoint, the team occasionally indicates which team
member produced which information on each slide. Notes indicate that one team member did not
contribute to the final project. |
Using the
notes function of PowerPoint, the team rarely indicates which team member
produced which information on each slide.
Notes indicate that some team members did not contribute to the final
project. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or team made no notations as to which student produced which
information. |
Oral presen-tation of Power Point |
All members of
the team take an equal part
presenting the Power Point.
Team members do not merely read the PowerPoint aloud, but explain the
information on the slides as they show them to the class. |
All members of
the team take an equal part
presenting the Power Point.
Team members do not merely read the PowerPoint aloud, but often do not
explain the slides as they show them to the class. |
Members of the team take unequal parts in presenting the
Power Point. Team members often do not
explain the slides as they present to the class. |
Members of the
team take unequal parts in
presenting the Power Point.
Team members simply read the slides as they present to the class. |
PowerPoint not
handed in or group does not present to the class. |
NY State Standards:
Social Studies
Standard 1: History of the
Standard 5:
Civics, Citizenship, and Government
English
Language Arts
Standard 1: Language for Information
and Understanding
Standard 3:
Language for Critical Analysis and Evaluation
Mathematics, Science, and Technology
Standard 2:
Information Systems
Conclusion:
After all six groups have presented
their findings, students will come to see that despite
the best intentions of Congress in the Reconstruction era, the intent of the 13th,
14th and 15th amendments had been distorted. Jim Crow laws in the South and discrimination
in the North had denied African-Americans their basic liberties. Students will come to see that the Civil
Rights movement of the 1960s sought to rectify the injustices and to establish
a society where African-Americans could indeed be “free at last.”