TIPS Project
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


WATER POLLUTION

 

 

 

Joseph A. Surace
 



Water Pollution in the New York City Area

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The social problem of water pollution had its roots in the nineteenth century U.S.A. during industrialization and urbanization, which occurred at the most rapid pace in the history of the world. Public policy and governments could not keep up with the growth of factories and cities and thus laws were inadequate to protect the environment. We are still combating the same problem today.

 

You are a student working on testing the pH of water samples in your neighborhood for a science lab. While testing the water you notice the water contains contaminants. When you realize what you have just discovered, you are shocked and think this is a bad dream. Your chemistry teacher just covered nuclear energy and water pollution in class and you learned that during the 1950’s nuclear energy was all the rage. You learned how many nuclear wastes were improperly disposed of during that time right up to the present day. You also know that the nuclear power plant Indian Point is located just two miles from your High School. Why has no one has discovered this potential disaster before? In the past month you were handpicked by the Mayor of NYC to head a program called “Operation Cleanup.” You wonder: How can I use my new position as head of Operation Cleanup to bring more awareness of this problem to the people of New York and to help save them from this bleak situation?

 


The Task:

 

You and the other members of Operation Cleanup are to explore the extent of water pollution in the NYC area within a 50-mile radius of Indian Point. Working to develop a public policy to deal with this social problem, each of you will have a part to play in this project. One or a group of students must do the fieldwork and bring back water samples for testing pollutants (contaminants). The others will split the responsibility and research the possible legal ramifications concerning acceptable levels of pollutants found in the water. You will use the TIPS Public Policy Analyst to assist in the development of your policy suggestions.

 

 

Upon completion of readings and highlighting important facts pertaining to specific pollutants, you must write a three-page report using Microsoft word, addressing the source of the pollution, acceptable levels of pollutants, and any guidelines for disposing the wastes into potable water sites. You must include a written plan of action for the purification of the water. Included in the report, you must have a cover page followed by three written pages and finally a bibliography including no less than three sites as stated in the rubric above. All papers must be typed and double-spaced.

 

You will also be asked to create a Power Point presentation, which should last between five to ten minutes. This presentation should cover the problem of water pollution and possible solutions.

 

Some things to consider (Guidelines):

 

1)    Points will be deducted for incorrect use of grammar and spelling errors.

2)    Remember: neatness counts!

3)    You must then be ready to present your report to the class. (Approximately a ten-minute oral presentation).

4)    Power Point presentations are mandatory. (A laptop and overhead projector are available).

5)    A five-minute question and answer period should be provided for your classmates at the end of your presentation.

6)    In order to complete the task (project) you must use the Public Policy Analyst report.

 

* Be sure to read the requirements on the Rubric included in this outline.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


THE PROCESS:

 

All students involved in the project will familiarize themselves with the aspects of how to investigate water pollution by the use of the scientific method, journals, fact finding, surfing the web sites and finally reporting their results in a methodical fashion. Students have an option to work in pairs or in groups of more than two people. You will focus your research around the TIPS PPA Public Polciy Analyst. You will complete the work sheet using the Internet resources given below. Each part of the process should be guided by the Public Policy Analyst program. The Public Policy steps are as follows: The worksheets and information gathered about the social problem of water pollution, its causes and existing public policy will become part of your power point and paper.

 

1)    Define the problem.

2)    Gather evidence.

3)    Identify causes.

4)    Evaluate a policy

5)    Develop possible solutions

 

Please keep in mind the above are guidelines , from which you will make critical judgments. These problem solving decisions will be accomplished both individually and on a group basis. New websites should be considered during your investigation using general search engines such as Google, Yahoo and Altavista, etc. 

 

Once you understand the causes of water pollution and the existing public policy meant to address the problem, you will be ready to make new public policy that will improve the environment and the living conditions for all of earth’s  inhabitants.

 

 

The final report of findings should include:

 

1)    At least two locations (websites) of new and old articles on water pollutants, nuclear and other wise.

2)    Research must also include two additional sources such as books, which describe radioactive or chemical contaminants. Articles from periodicals are acceptable. A reputable textbook may also be included in the search but no newspaper articles or “Fliers” of any sort.


 

 


Meeting the New York State Learning Standards

 

When students are working on this project they will demonstrate and show evidence of the following scientific connections and applications:

 

1)   S4a-Big ideas and unifying concepts, such as order and organization; models, form and function; change and constancy; and cause and effect.

2)   S4d-Impact of technology, such as constraints and trade-offs; feedback benefit and risks; and problems and solutions.

3)   S4e-Impact of science, such as historical and contemporary contribution and interactions between science and society.

 

 

This project provides students with an opportunity to demonstrate their skills in scientific inquiry, problem solving, critical thinking, and knowledge of science and basic common sense when solving scientific problems within a group setting.

 

This activity allows students to:

 

1)    S5a-Frame questions to distinguish cause and effect; and identify or control variables in experimental and non-experimental research settings.

2)    S5c-Use evidence from reliable sources to develop descriptions, explanations and models; and make appropriate adjustments and improvements based on additional data or logical arguments.

3)    S5d-Prospose, recognize, analyze, consider, and critique alternative explanations and distinguish between fact and opinion.

4)    S5e-Identify problems; propose and implement solutions; and evaluate the accuracy, design, and outcomes of investigations.

5)    S5f-Work individually and in teams to collect and share information and ideas.

 

Scientific Communication:

 

When gathering data, water samples and comparing them to the normal standards for potable water, the student learns about communicating scientific information within a group setting.  The reporting back of this information allows the student to have a deeper understanding in that the student:

 

 

S7B-argues from evidence, such as data produced through his or her experimentation or data produced by others.

S7c-Critiques published materials, such as popular magazines and academic journals.

S7d-Explain a scientific concept or procedure to other students.

 

Scientific Investigation:

 

The students complete the project by taking information from all levels of the scientific community. Students learn to put all this information together in a step-by-step orderly fashion. Each year it should be mandatory for students to complete another investigation (project) by using standards one to seven and they need to represent all four types of investigation.

 

          S8d-Secondary research

 

 

RESOURCES

 

The following Web sites can assist your research:

 

·        http://www.aolsvc.worldbook.aol.com/wbol/wbAuth/jsp/wbArticle.jsp

      An article dealing with water pollution.

·        www.ukrivers.net/pollution.html

A whole site dedicated towards water pollution.

·        www.umich.edu/~gs265/society/waterpollution.htm

Contains causes and types of water pollution, also nice pictures and references.

·        www.stemnet.nf.ca/CITE/water.htm

      A nice site dedicated to water; has a section on water pollution.

·        www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/default.asp

An online book that discusses water including water pollution.

·        www.ec.gc.ca/envpriorities/cleanwater_e.htm

Site water pollution and how to renovate bodies of water.

·        http://www.brighton73.freeserve.co.uk/tomsplace/ scientific/msc-thesis/mst-revi.htm
A review of the use of enzyme induction in aquatic organisms to detect
water pollution. 

·        www.cepp.cc

      A site devoted to educating people on water pollution.

·        www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/hhudson.asp

Discussion on plans to remove PCB from the Hudson.

·        www.geocities.com/RainForest/5161/

Introduction to water pollution, wastewater treatment, and water analysis.

·        www.soton.ac.uk/~engenvir/index/enviro_index.html

Basic information about pollution.

·        www.pprc.org

An extensive source of information on pollution prevention technologies and implementation.

·        www.ukrivers.net/pollution.html

A large index of books and other resources on pollution

 

General Search Engines

·        www.google.com

·        www.yahoo.com

·        www.altavista.com

 


 

 

 

 

EVALUATION

 

Oral Presentation Evaluation Form: Use the evaluation form below to rate the presentation by your classmate. The rubric below describes the rating for each category. This will be used as your rubric for the written report as well. 

 

 

 

Name:                                                         Date:                               Class: _____________

 

 

Exceptional      

Admirable

Acceptable

Poor

1

Content

An abundance of material

clearly related to thesis; points

are clearly made and all

evidence supports thesis;

various use of materials.

Sufficient Information

that relates to thesis;

many good points

made but there is an

uneven balance and

little variation.

There is a great deal of information that is not clearly connected to the

thesis

Thesis not clear

information included

that does not support thesis in

any way

2 Coherence         and Organization

Thesis is clearly stated and

developed; specific examples

are appropriate and clearly

develop thesis; conclusion is

clear; shows control; flows

together well; good transitions

succinct but not choppy; well

organized

Most information

presented in logical

sequence; generally

very well organized

but better transitions

from idea to idea and medium and medium

needed

Concept and ideas

are loosely

connected; lacks

clear transitions;

flow and

organization are choppy

Presentation is

choppy and

disjointed; does not

flow; development

of thesis is vague;

no apparent logical

order of

presentation

3 Creativity

Very original presentation of

material; uses the unexpected

to full advantage; captures

audiences’s attention

Some originally

apparent; good variety

and blending of

materials/media

Little or no variation;

material presented

with little originality

or interpretation

 

Repetitive with little

or no variety;

insufficient use of multimedia

4 Material

Balanced use of multimedia

materials; properly used to

develop thesis; use of media is  varied and appropriate

Use of multimedia not as varied and not as

well connected to

thesis

Choppy use of

multimedia

materials; lacks

smooth transition

from one medium to

another; multimedia

not clearly

connected to thesis

Little or no

multimedia used or

ineffective use of

multimedia;

imbalance in use of

materials—too

much of one, not

enough of another

5 Speaking Skills

Poised, cleared, articulation;

proper volume; steady rate

good posture and eye contact; enthusiasm; confidence

Clear articulation but

not as polished

Some mumbling;

little eye contact;

uneven rate; little or no expression

Inaudible or too

loud; no eye

contact; rate too

slow/fast; speaker

seemed

uninterested and

used monotone

6 Audience Response

Involved the audience in the presentation; points made in creative way; held the audience’s attention

throughout

Presented facts with some interesting

“twists”; held the

audience’s attention

most of the time

Some related facts

but went off topic

and lost the

audience; mostly

presented facts with little or no imagination

Incoherent;

audience lost

interest and could not determine the point of the presentation

7 Length of Presentation

Within two minutes of allotted Time +/-

Within four minutes of Allotted time +/-

Within six minutes of allotted time +/-

Too long or too Short; ten or more Minutes above or Below the allotted time

 

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

In conclusion, you should have learned that water pollution is a serious social problem. In your investigation you have seen what causes water pollution and know what the Public Policy is and what new Public Policies could be introduced because of your findings. This project also taught the students to understand the scientific procedure and how to investigate cause and effect. By the use of the Public Policy rules students should have concluded when laws need to be changed.

 

Our next Web Quest could be to investigate air pollution. We will concentrate on the social problem caused by air pollution next term.