Assignment	Category	3	2	1
Multimedia Project (PSA)	Content	Covers topic in depth with details & examples. Subject knowledge is excellent!	Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors.	Content is minimal and/or there are several factual errors.
	Program Mastery	Used one of the presentation software’s we learned this year. Makes excellent use of font, color, background, graphics, effects, transitions, background music, etc. to enhance the presentation.	Used one of the presentation software’s we learned this year. Incorporated some of the programs tools but occasionally these detracted from the presentation content.	Used one of the presentation software’s we learned this year. But did not incorporate any of the programs tools or these often distract from the presentation content.
	Organization	Content is well organized using headings to separate the 4 presentation sections/topics.	Content is logically organized for the most part, but organization of topics seems flawed.	There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts.
	Storyboard	Storyboard was completely filled out.	Storyboard was partly filled out.	Storyboard was not filled out at all or not turned in/ lost.
	Presentation of Argument	Students made an excellent argument, backed up with facts, very persuasive, and demonstrated a great deal of thought. Presentation holds the audiences attention. Presenters had clear dynamic voices.	Students had an argument, but not many facts to back it up. Holds audiences attention most of the time. Presenters spoke to quiet making it difficult to hear.	No argument made, limited facts listed. Audience attention often lost. Presenters spoke to quiet, mumbled, mispronounced words making it difficult to hear.
	Originality	Presentation shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are presented in creative format.	Presentation shows some original thought. Ideas are not presented in a creative way.	Uses other people’s ideas. Does not have a catchy presentation format.
	Teamwork	It is evident that a mutual effort & cohesive unit created the final presentation..	The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other’s skills to a better degree.	The team had problems working together. Little or no brainstorming/ collaboration occurred.
	Mechanics	No misspellings or grammatical errors.	Three or fewer misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar.
Top 10 List of Internet Safety Tips	Content/ Accuracy	All 10 tips listed are relevant to Internet Safety. And all 4 roles topics are represented making a well rounded tips list. The poster includes all required elements.	Most tips listed are relevant to Internet Safety. 3 out of the 4 roles topics are represented missing some of the required elements.	Less than 5 items are related to Internet Safety. 2 out of the 4 roles topics are represented missing most of the required elements.
	Attractiveness	The tips list is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout, and neatness. Creative design for screen savers in our district.	The tips list is somewhat attractive though it may be a little messy. Standard Design.	The tips list is distracting, messy, unorganized, & poorly designed.
	Graphics	All graphics are related to the topic and make it easier to understand.	All graphics are related to the topic but serve as a distraction.	Graphics do not relate to the topic and are distractions to the reader.
Question Sheets	Completeness	All questions were answered completely and rationales for the answers were clearly stated. All 4-group members placed in their portfolio folder stapled together.	Most questions were answered completely but rationales for the answers were not provided. 3 of the 4 group members placed in their portfolio folder stapled together.	Some questions were answered completely and no rationale was provided for the answers. 2 or less group members placed in their portfolio folder stapled together.
Role Sheet	Completeness	Turned in Completed with all signatures neatly in their portfolio folder.	Not completed with all group members signatures & date but turned in their portfolio.	Not completed. Not turned in. Lost/ did not do.
Internet Safety Contracts	Completeness	All 4 members turned in & completed both the Kids’ Pledge, and the Parents Pledge Family Contract for Online Safety with parent signature & students’ signature.	3 of the 4 members turned in & completed only 1of the 2 Family Contract for Online Safety with parents’ signature & student’s signature.	2 or fewer members did not turn in. Was never turned into their portfolio or did not complete either Family Contract for Online Safety. Or did not get parents signature & student’s signature.
Internet Safety Plan	Completeness	All 4 members turned in & completed the Internet Safety Plan with correct responses to all 9 questions. Included parent’s signature & student’s signature.	3 of the 4 members turned in & completed the Internet Safety Plan with almost all correct responses to all 9 questions. Included student signature but not parent signature.	2 or fewer members turned in & completed the Internet Safety Plan with some correct responses to 7 or less questions. Did not include either parent or student required signatures.
Group Evaluation Rubric	Completeness	All 4 members turned in & filled out an evaluation on each of their group member’s contribution/ participation levels.	3 of the 4 members turned in & filled out an evaluation on each of their group member’s contribution/ participation levels.	2 or less members turned in & filled out an evaluation on each of their group member’s contribution/ participation levels.

TOTAL:

TEACHER COMMENTS: