The The Miranda v. Arizona Decision:
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miranda. The Court ruled that prosecutors were constitutionally forbidden to use incriminating statements obtained from suspects during interrogation unless strict procedural safeguards had been followed to guarantee that the individual was aware of his constitutional rights to remain silent and to have the aid of an attorney.
You have now completed the Miranda v. Arizona analysis using the Project LEGAL method.

If you wish to investigate this case in further detail, CompuLEGAL has created Follow Up Questions that identify some of the issues it raises.  You may also want to read the entire Miranda v. Arizona decision.

If you are done with this case and wish to examine a new case, you should return to the CompuLEGAL Database.

You may also return to the Project LEGAL Homepage to find a list of legal links, to use Public Policy Analyst, or if you are enrolled in one of Project LEGAL's programs, to Ask-A-Legal-Eagle your legal question!