1. What could the University of Michigan have done differently to pass the strict scrutiny test?
2. Should only ethnic and racial minorities be considered under-represented groups, or should the class be changed to include all people who are economically less well-off? Why or why not?
3. What are some of the advantages that come from having a more diverse student population?

(If your teacher has asked you to type responses to these questions, typing space and a print key are located below.)

Follow this link to read the entire Gratz v. Bollinger decision.

If you are done with this case and wish to examine a new case, you should return to the CompuLEGAL Database.

You may also return to the Project LEGAL Homepage to find a list of legal links, to use Public Policy Analyst, or if you are enrolled in one of Project LEGAL's programs, to Ask-A-Legal-Eagle your legal question!

Thank you for using CompuLEGAL!