The Florida v. Riley Decision:
The Supreme Court in a 5-4 vote reversed the decision arguing that the accused did not have a reasonable expectation that the greenhouse was protected from observation from a helicopter, and decided that therefore the helicopter surveillance did not constitute a search under the Fourth Amendment.

You have now completed the Florida v. Riley analysis using the Project LEGAL method.

If you wish to investigate this case in further detail, CompuLEGAL has created Follow Up Questions that identify some of the issues it raises.  You may also want to read the entire Florida v. Riley decision.

If you are done with this case and wish to examine a new case, you should return to the CompuLEGAL Database.

You may also return to the Project LEGAL Homepage to find a list of legal links, to use Public Policy Analyst, or if you are enrolled in one of Project LEGAL's programs, to Ask-A-Legal-Eagle your legal question!