Florida v. Jimeno Precedents:
-
Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990): The Fourth Amendment does not proscribe
all state-initiated search and seizures; it merely proscribes those which are
unreasonable.
-
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973): We have long approved consensual
searches because it is no doubt reasonable for the police to conduct a
search once they have been permitted to do so.
-
Katz v. U.S. (1967): By placing his possessions inside a container, an
individual manifests an intent that his possessions be preserved as private.
-
U.S. v. Ross (1982): The scope of a search is generally defined by its
expressed object.
-
South Dakota v. Opperman (1976): Cars are subjected to pervasive and
continuing governmental regulation and controls.
-
U.S. v. Chadwick (1977): An individual has a heightened expectation of
privacy in the contents of a closed container.